Who Changes Their Own Oil/Filter?
#76
I agree with you totally with similar experiences......not just with Lexus, but also with MB's.
The "monkey wrench" changing your oil at most dealerships (even high end dealerships) are the "lowest paying dude" in the entire shop!!!
Question: So which one is better? The Mobil One filter or the OEM Lexus (Toyota) filter? I usually use the OEM Lexus (Toyota) filters, but sometimes use the WIX WP filters.
The "monkey wrench" changing your oil at most dealerships (even high end dealerships) are the "lowest paying dude" in the entire shop!!!
Question: So which one is better? The Mobil One filter or the OEM Lexus (Toyota) filter? I usually use the OEM Lexus (Toyota) filters, but sometimes use the WIX WP filters.
Doing some simple maintenance on your car is just like most things in life... It appears so complicated at first because you're not familiar with it, but once you've done it you realize there's really nothing to it.
I like doing the maintenance items on my car because I like to know that the work has actually been done, done correctly, and done with quality parts/ fluids. And I also find it rewarding. The $ savings is nice, but the other reasons are of more importantance to me.
Every place is different, but one thing I noticed when I was taking my cars in for oil changes when I was younger was that it seemed they would always overfill it no matter where I went.
I purchased the OEM Lexus filter and the Mobil 1 extended performance filter to compare the two. I thought you guys might like seeing a comparison as I thought it was kinda shocking the difference in quality and weight. You can guess which one I went with...
I like doing the maintenance items on my car because I like to know that the work has actually been done, done correctly, and done with quality parts/ fluids. And I also find it rewarding. The $ savings is nice, but the other reasons are of more importantance to me.
Every place is different, but one thing I noticed when I was taking my cars in for oil changes when I was younger was that it seemed they would always overfill it no matter where I went.
I purchased the OEM Lexus filter and the Mobil 1 extended performance filter to compare the two. I thought you guys might like seeing a comparison as I thought it was kinda shocking the difference in quality and weight. You can guess which one I went with...
#77
Weight is an interesting issue, and can be a helpful point of reference. In this case, though, you simply cannot make a direct comparison between filter weight and "better/worse filtration" because the metal components (primary source of M1's extra weight) do not perform any filtration whatsoever. After all, "filtration" is the real issue here. That said, it is clear that the M1 element is built more robustly, but that only matters if there is a historical problem with the OEM filter falling apart... and I do not believe that is an issue at all, so the heavily built M1 is almost a moot point altogether.
The true test of a filter's capability is found in three characteristics (I believe it is a rare thing for ANY filter to come apart and let gross junk pass into the engine):
1. flow rate (if you can't get enough oil through the filter fast enough, you cannot achieve adequate lubrication in the engine)
2. pressure loss across the filter (if the downstream oil pressure is too low, you cannot achieve adequate lubrication in the engine)
3. particle size/quantity allowed through the filter (if you cannot trap enough abrasive particulate inside the filter, you will experience premature internal wear in the engine)
Testing the above three issues cannot be done with a simple scale. What we CAN do is the following:
A. Tear open the filter element and measure the amount of surface area of the filter media
B. Weigh JUST the filter media
C. Measure the thickness of the filter media
However, all three of the A-B-C steps above are only surrogate indications of quality because we cannot measure the differential pressure at flow and temperature or the particle rejection efficiencies without extensive lab setups. That means that we have to rely on large third party unbiased organizations to perform these kinds of filtration tests, but they are rarely available. Consequently, we have to rely on "reputation" and marketing, for the most part, but we need to recognize that a lot of word of mouth reputation is heavily influenced by fear-based marketing. It's just the way it is.
For grins and giggles, I've linked three oil filter test/comparison studies just to demonstrate the level of detail required for a true evaluation of an oil filter. NOTE... I neither support nor oppose any of the linked studies because I have not studied them in detail, and have provided the links as EXAMPLES ONLY. Incidentally, none of the links below include a Toyota filter element.
https://www.austincc.edu/wkibbe/oilfilterstudy.htm
http://www.gmtruckcentral.com/articl...lterstudy.html
https://filtrationcomparisons.weebly...d-results.html
Below is one more filter comparison (includes Toyota, but not M1). Again, this one is not a true performance comparison, just technical data about the filtration media differences between brands, and is a more in-depth explanation of what I've mentioned above.
https://parts.olathetoyota.com/tacom...ter-comparison
The true test of a filter's capability is found in three characteristics (I believe it is a rare thing for ANY filter to come apart and let gross junk pass into the engine):
1. flow rate (if you can't get enough oil through the filter fast enough, you cannot achieve adequate lubrication in the engine)
2. pressure loss across the filter (if the downstream oil pressure is too low, you cannot achieve adequate lubrication in the engine)
3. particle size/quantity allowed through the filter (if you cannot trap enough abrasive particulate inside the filter, you will experience premature internal wear in the engine)
Testing the above three issues cannot be done with a simple scale. What we CAN do is the following:
A. Tear open the filter element and measure the amount of surface area of the filter media
B. Weigh JUST the filter media
C. Measure the thickness of the filter media
However, all three of the A-B-C steps above are only surrogate indications of quality because we cannot measure the differential pressure at flow and temperature or the particle rejection efficiencies without extensive lab setups. That means that we have to rely on large third party unbiased organizations to perform these kinds of filtration tests, but they are rarely available. Consequently, we have to rely on "reputation" and marketing, for the most part, but we need to recognize that a lot of word of mouth reputation is heavily influenced by fear-based marketing. It's just the way it is.
For grins and giggles, I've linked three oil filter test/comparison studies just to demonstrate the level of detail required for a true evaluation of an oil filter. NOTE... I neither support nor oppose any of the linked studies because I have not studied them in detail, and have provided the links as EXAMPLES ONLY. Incidentally, none of the links below include a Toyota filter element.
https://www.austincc.edu/wkibbe/oilfilterstudy.htm
http://www.gmtruckcentral.com/articl...lterstudy.html
https://filtrationcomparisons.weebly...d-results.html
Below is one more filter comparison (includes Toyota, but not M1). Again, this one is not a true performance comparison, just technical data about the filtration media differences between brands, and is a more in-depth explanation of what I've mentioned above.
https://parts.olathetoyota.com/tacom...ter-comparison
Last edited by F250; 07-27-18 at 07:07 AM.
The following users liked this post:
salimshah (07-27-18)
#78
Thank you for the info. Of course, there are many variables to consider. What made me think about the difference in the two filters was the mention of extended drain intervals and running our oil and filters longer than before. My point was just about the ruggedness of the filter. It appears to me to be built to last longer. I will not be taking to the lab and conducting the tests and research mentioned, so I can only make a choice based on the limited information that is readily available to me.
#79
Along with the engineering [least cost for the purpose] there is a trend to go green.
I grew up with a car that needed felt (or felt like) filter. That was given up for a quick 1/2 minute remove and install .. all in one can filter ... and now a green (er) filter which takes more time to remove and install. We have made a full circle.
Salim
I grew up with a car that needed felt (or felt like) filter. That was given up for a quick 1/2 minute remove and install .. all in one can filter ... and now a green (er) filter which takes more time to remove and install. We have made a full circle.
Salim
#81
This is an article by Amsoil that contributed to my decision to go with a "premium grade" filter.
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g2192.pdf
They did test a Toyota filter.
Again, I understand that there are many variables.
And yes, I know that it is for Amsoil and not Mobil1
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g2192.pdf
They did test a Toyota filter.
Again, I understand that there are many variables.
And yes, I know that it is for Amsoil and not Mobil1
#82
Thank you for the info. Of course, there are many variables to consider. What made me think about the difference in the two filters was the mention of extended drain intervals and running our oil and filters longer than before. My point was just about the ruggedness of the filter. It appears to me to be built to last longer. I will not be taking to the lab and conducting the tests and research mentioned, so I can only make a choice based on the limited information that is readily available to me.
This is an article by Amsoil that contributed to my decision to go with a "premium grade" filter.
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g2192.pdf
They did test a Toyota filter.
Again, I understand that there are many variables.
And yes, I know that it is for Amsoil and not Mobil1
https://www.amsoil.com/lit/databulletins/g2192.pdf
They did test a Toyota filter.
Again, I understand that there are many variables.
And yes, I know that it is for Amsoil and not Mobil1
#83
Re the Mobil1 oil filter, the number of pleats (folds?) look substantially more than the Toyota part. So in theory, there is siginficantly more filter material surface area. This could account for the "extended performance" claim. I would still go with the factory OEM, but will only purchase from a Toyota dealership over the counter, as there are lots of fakes out there.
#85
Tiny holes in the air filter are a much more significant issue when running a turbocharged intake system. As long as you're not doing extended OCI's, tiny microscopic holes will not create any significant issue at all. Saying that, though, I would not blow out an air filter either for risk of actually creating a tear or rupture in a place where you can't see it. Alternatively, you could vacuum it with a brush attachment, but in all honesty, air filters are cheap and there is no justification (in my mind) to risk compromising its integrity for the sake of a few dollars. Just change it every year and worry about bigger things!
#86
#87
I have an oil suction device, which I have not tried on the Lexus before. I bought it for the C class Merc I had a long time ago. Will try it and let you know. I guess it's a bit redundant for a Lexus because one does need to get underneath the vehicle to replace the engine oil filter anyways. On a Merc engine, the filter is right at the top, and can be easily accessed, so an oil suction device makes sense.
Not worth the risk getting the suction tube stuck in the oil dipstick tube.
#90
Back from my drive 1200 miles a week, for a year, times, I became very partial to Quaker State. As I then did oil changes every 3000 miles (2002) and I got real tired of doing it every 3rd week. Out of all oils I tried then, QS was the best lasting one.
Otherwise, nowerdays, I call a synthetic a synthetic. They are all about same in quality and I am not the type to pay premium for fancy name. For casual driver, what we are 99%, oill is oil. It's when you get into racing on autobahn or ripping tires in the ciy, that minor additives make difference. But who really does this...
Otherwise, nowerdays, I call a synthetic a synthetic. They are all about same in quality and I am not the type to pay premium for fancy name. For casual driver, what we are 99%, oill is oil. It's when you get into racing on autobahn or ripping tires in the ciy, that minor additives make difference. But who really does this...
The following users liked this post:
EA6BMECH (09-24-18)