RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015) Discussion topics related to the 2010 - 2015 RX350 and RX450H models

Confused on the RX's, especially on the F sports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-17, 07:51 PM
  #1  
Buddiiee
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
Buddiiee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Boston
Posts: 327
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Confused on the RX's, especially on the F sports

Considering an RX350. Can anyone tell me why they ADDED SIX HUNDRED pounds but reduced the HP by 36? This seems to me that you're overburdening the engine thus destroying fuel efficiency. (and fun I might add). Is this "350" NOT the same "350" in my IS???
The reports I've been reading state that the F sport version is a touch quicker; how, as it was always only a suspension package. I missed something...
The AWD RX350's from 2014 and below; are their transmissions normal? Or do they have that really stupid CVT crap that sounds like they're stuck in one gear lower than they should be.
Are the F sports suspension that much stiffer in your guy's opinions? (those of you that test drove them at least) I HATE firm rides-are they too firm?
And lastly, would anyone know if these are tunable? If they're not I'm not sure I could own one. Thanks guys.
Old 06-19-17, 04:50 AM
  #2  
Stoodo
Advanced
iTrader: (4)
 
Stoodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 542
Received 87 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

You should just pass on the RX idea. It sounds like you'll never be happy.
The following users liked this post:
joedaddy1 (06-19-17)
Old 06-19-17, 06:02 AM
  #3  
Fpan87
Pit Crew
 
Fpan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 113
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buddiiee
Considering an RX350. Can anyone tell me why they ADDED SIX HUNDRED pounds but reduced the HP by 36? This seems to me that you're overburdening the engine thus destroying fuel efficiency. (and fun I might add). Is this "350" NOT the same "350" in my IS???
The reports I've been reading state that the F sport version is a touch quicker; how, as it was always only a suspension package. I missed something...
The AWD RX350's from 2014 and below; are their transmissions normal? Or do they have that really stupid CVT crap that sounds like they're stuck in one gear lower than they should be.
Are the F sports suspension that much stiffer in your guy's opinions? (those of you that test drove them at least) I HATE firm rides-are they too firm?
And lastly, would anyone know if these are tunable? If they're not I'm not sure I could own one. Thanks guys.
I'm not sure if it's really quicker overall compared to the non f sport model, but initial acceleration has more kick to it and accelerates much smoother compared to the standard Rx. As far as fuel economy goes, f sport wins over the standard again. After switching to the f sport, I've noticed a 2-3 MPG improvement.
Old 06-19-17, 11:27 AM
  #4  
Buddiiee
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
Buddiiee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Boston
Posts: 327
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stoodo
You should just pass on the RX idea. It sounds like you'll never be happy.
Not at all. I'm just trying to find out how stiff the ride really is. If the RX is tuneable (which I found out it is) and has a supple enough ride, that's good enough for me.
Old 06-19-17, 12:08 PM
  #5  
mcomer
Lead Lap
 
mcomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 3,532
Received 849 Likes on 642 Posts
Default

Buddiiee, The 3.5 in an RX burns Regular fuel and makes 270 HP (295 HP in 2016-17's). The 3.5 in the IS/GS/RC burns Premium
and makes 306 HP. No, using Premium in an RX does not make the jump...

The 2015 and previous RX350 F-Sport package included the 8-Speed transaxle (STD in 2016-present) as an upgrade from the 6 speed
that regular 350's had. MPG increased from 18/24 to 18/26. Only the RX450h Hybrid has the CVT and gets 30/28.
(BTW, 0-60 times: RX350 AWD 6 speed 7.8, RX350 AWD F-Sport 7.7, RX450h AWD 7.4)

While the springs/shocks are a bit firmer the real ride difference comes from the "19 wheels with 55 section tires
(same tires on Appearance Package 350's)
Old 06-19-17, 12:29 PM
  #6  
Buddiiee
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
Buddiiee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Boston
Posts: 327
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Yea, just looked up the different engines. I found out why just now; the 3.5 in the RX is mounted in the wrong wheel drive fashion, and because of that has a smaller stroke And that may preclude headers too.... DAMM do I hate wrong wheel drive cars. They just suck soo bad it's not even funny. They're soo unnecessarily complicated for no good reason. There was never anything wrong with RWD or AWD.

At any rate they're tuneable so I'm happy :0)

Last edited by kitlz; 06-19-17 at 02:39 PM. Reason: language
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tribute182
RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022)
63
07-24-23 03:38 PM
jadeboy
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
16
04-03-21 09:01 PM
Yachtman
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
11
05-09-17 06:37 AM
taleh
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
5
02-15-11 06:30 PM
kona44
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
9
10-29-10 11:02 PM



Quick Reply: Confused on the RX's, especially on the F sports



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 AM.