cruzer23

2013 104k miles OTD $15650(book value=$16,300)
brand new Michelin tires, big backup camera
1 owner, perfect service records
Is this one worth $6000 more than the cheap one?

2010 95k miles OTD $13467(book value=$13,100)
brand new cheap tires, no backup camera,
3 minor fender benders(clean title)
little service records
probably should get a pre purchase inspection done to make sure no frame damage?

2011 163k miles OTD $9318(book value=$11,300(clean retail, more like average)decent tread tires, small backup camera
great service records all 160,000 miles
i would get a pre purchase inspection done on this to be safe
Is this high of milage just asking for trouble on a vacation trip? It drove perfectly

mdbrown

Easy call for me, I'd go for the 2013 simply because I like the front end much, much better than on the 2010-2012 models. That said, any of the 3 will likely serve you well. My 2007 has 215k miles on it and there are still times when I have to look at the tach to make sure the engine is running. Even if I didn't care about the body style I'd probably still go for #1 just because it's a single owner with a good service record. I paid $20k for my 2014 (single owner, 81k miles, looks brand new).

takeshi74

Worth is up to you to determine. The service records on the 2013 are a good thing but even it should be inspected.

Droid13

For me, one of the big deciding factors should be how long you plan to keep it. If this is going to be a keeper for 5+ yrs, go with the 2013 for sure. If this is just something that'll get you by for a couple years before moving on to something else, then one of the other two.