RXOwner

I have listened to the non-ML and ML systems and the ML sounds so much better there is little excuse to not want it except the extra cost. I have had the ML system in my last 4 Lexus and have zero regrets.

coolsaber

Audio requirements are a matter of personal preference. With the ML vs Non ML i really cannot recognize the clarity that say I have seen in vehicles with and without say the B&W (xc90), or B&O (X5). Just my ears I guess. But always for stuff like audio, sit it it, test it out with your music and sources and see what fits best. The upgrade is worth it if you feel your in-car audio needs are being neglected without the ML.

brxsilva

Actually my first choice was to get a 2016 RX 450H with the Caviar exterior and black leather interior(the color combo I wanted) which had the ML system and a whole lot of extras. Only thing I didn't like was the chrome wheels but I would have settled. However when we test drove it, there was so much vibration and noise in the back. Something to do with engine changing from hybrid to gas or something like that so the salesman said. My wife said that she and the children would be bothered by it whenever they ride in the back. It would have been so cost effective based it being a hybrid as well as it would still be much less than what I was paying for my GX. So I settled for a RX350 with a Caviar exterior and a noble brown interior because there was no black leather interior at that time.
Oh well, happy wife...happy life. I am happy that I was able to get 20" wheels and a NAV with the 12.3" display. Maybe next time I'll have my cake and eat it too.
My teen step daughter did say that the ML systems in my 2014 GX460 and 2006 LX470 were much better than my wife's non-ML system in her 2013 GS350.

RXOwner

Glad your choosing is over and now you can enjoy. I love the caviar and get many compliments on it weekly. Sometimes when the Sunday hits it I have to admit it is quite nice indeed. I have owned a 450h and never could get used to the CVT but every one need to make their own choices.

bootman

Don't forget to do a right up on the sub swap.
Personally I think the ML system is fine.
Depending on the music the bass is there, just like it should be.

I'm impressed on how every seat in the RX gets great imaging from the system.
Those that have played with auto aftermarket installs knows how hard that is to get if not almost impossible. Sure you can dial in the driver but to get good imaging from every seat?
That is very impressive and worth every penny I paid.

aznkorboi

For sure. I love the clarity but just need a little more low end.

These are the parts I plan on getting.

I have a 10 inch JL sub with box.

Then I BELIEVE all I need are these things:




This way I can tune the bass on the fly, keep the OG head unit, and not have to tinker too much with other settings.

These would be installed by a stereo guy. I will let you guys know what happens. Will most likely do this in June/July

aznkorboi

Forgot to mention that I will prob dynamat the front doors and maybe the gas tank area if people talk about issues with rattling like the NX.

RXOwner

Sounds like a great solution.

bootman

If you get an amp with high level inputs you can skip the first item.
Just tap the current sub's already filtered signal.

aznkorboi

good to know! THanks

roblim

I am hearing no rattles, but the side mirrors vibrate when i turn the volume past 36 on the ML stereo and I am playing bass heavy music. Would dynamat help?

aznkorboi

I believe dynamat will help.

It basically dampens the vibrations from the speaker itself. So, if that is wrapped around the metal near the speakers, the vibrations wouldn't be able to travel all the way up to the side mirrors. haha.

I'm just assuming that is what would happen. Regardless, others on the forum say dynamat makes the speakers sound even better with the ML system.

bootman

Without measurements to back it up it is just speculation based on the fact that they spent a ton of money and of course will say it sounds better.