RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022) Discussion topics related to the 2016 and up RX350 and RX450h models

Gas tank capacity??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-23, 05:29 PM
  #46  
ravenuer
Racer
 
ravenuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 1,780
Received 503 Likes on 380 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bamalam
Government fails once again. The brainiacs /s at fueleconomy.gov just took their 22mpg "combined" mileage and multiplied it by the RX's 19.2 gal fuel tank capacity. 22 x 19.2 = 422.4. That number assumes you run the tank bone dry. Given that the tank includes a low pressure fuel pump that depends on fuel for lubrication, it also means you'll be replacing that pump very often if you try to duplicate the government's numbers.
My practical reality is that I get 280-330 miles on a tank. I do a little better occasionally with lots of highway miles on flat terrain. (My RX is not an F Sport, but the F Sport package does not materially affect mileage or range.) It does appear that the Range figure after a fill-up is based on the mileage from the last tank. At least that's my anecdotal experience. BTW, I've run my RX down to zero miles remaining on the Range display, and never put more than ~16 gallons in the tank. Lexus tries to protect drivers from themselves, at least with respect to low fuel problems.
If I understand your post, then the "miles till empty" number would be exactly the same on every fillup. It's not, so how is it determined?
Old 09-28-23, 05:41 PM
  #47  
raytseng
Instructor
 
raytseng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

The computer uses a best guess at your expected mpg based on medium term driving habits, I don't have any exact formulas but I don't feel this exactly mean last tank, as you could fill up every 3gallons and count as a refuel; and I don't think it uses the user's ave MPG tracker feature either.

It will auto adjust range as it goes changing both the expected MPG and multiplying by estimated fuel left in your tank. It is not static for a whole tank.

If you scroll through, you can find screens that display instantaneous MPG going all over the place. A modern fuel injected vehicle knows exact fuel rates so it knows MPG and can estimate tank volumes. It is not hard for it to do some rolling calculations as it goes. It won't jump the Range up and down though to help the humans stay sane.. It'll only go 1way and instead pause the range countdown until it catches up and can continue the countdown.

Last edited by raytseng; 09-28-23 at 06:02 PM.
Old 09-29-23, 05:59 AM
  #48  
bamalam
Advanced
 
bamalam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: WV
Posts: 687
Received 416 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ravenuer
If I understand your post, then the "miles till empty" number would be exactly the same on every fillup. It's not, so how is it determined?
That's not what I intended. My primary message was in response to the OP's wondering how his actual range could be different than what fueleconomy.gov publishes. The short answer is the gov's number is pure fantasy, and only theoretically achievable by incurring damage to the vehicle. @raytseng 's description below is likely a good description of how the range is calculated.

Originally Posted by raytseng
The computer uses a best guess at your expected mpg based on medium term driving habits, I don't have any exact formulas but I don't feel this exactly mean last tank, as you could fill up every 3gallons and count as a refuel; and I don't think it uses the user's ave MPG tracker feature either.

It will auto adjust range as it goes changing both the expected MPG and multiplying by estimated fuel left in your tank. It is not static for a whole tank.

If you scroll through, you can find screens that display instantaneous MPG going all over the place. A modern fuel injected vehicle knows exact fuel rates so it knows MPG and can estimate tank volumes. It is not hard for it to do some rolling calculations as it goes. It won't jump the Range up and down though to help the humans stay sane.. It'll only go 1way and instead pause the range countdown until it catches up and can continue the countdown.
Well described. Fundamentally, the first range posted after a fillup will likely be least accurate, and the range will gradually become more accurate as it approaches zero.
Old 09-29-23, 11:14 AM
  #49  
GS4_Fiend
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (22)
 
GS4_Fiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 7,067
Received 111 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I dont ever look at the miles until empty. I like to calculate it manually.

I average 25 mpg on my F-Sport.
Old 09-29-23, 12:40 PM
  #50  
raytseng
Instructor
 
raytseng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I assume the OP is aware the humans low fuel light and computer est. range and is set with a 2.9gallon reserve?

There are other threads that explain the common reason is because low fuel will damage the fuel pump. I think this is only half the story.

Obviously gasoline is a liquid, so it sloshes around. Unless you have the vehicle on a treadmill, when you get to low fuel the real issue is the fuel can't be picked up reliability. If you are on a slope you might not get fuel at all, so they can't guarantee the vehicle will run. So this point is more about reliable fuel delivery due to gravity and liquids than just overheating the pump.
Additionally the problems are more than just the pump overheating. If it is barely picking up fuel, you could get unreliable fuel delivery to the engine. You can get misfires and surges. This is just as much of a concern. It is like for your home electrical where a brownout with power flickering is worse and cause more damage than if the grid shut down gracefully.

Anyway, if it's the zombie apocalypse, and you must drive the car until it dies, you probably could go that extra 2.9gallons x mpg assuming you're on a nice flat road.

Last edited by raytseng; 09-29-23 at 01:25 PM.
Old 09-29-23, 02:31 PM
  #51  
dibl
Instructor
 
dibl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 976
Received 689 Likes on 403 Posts
Default

On a round trip Dayton > Indianapolis > Dayton (266 miles) on Tuesday of this week, plus ~50 miles of local short-trip driving, my F-Sport got 24.8 mpg, per gas pump refill calculation. I use the radar cruise control as much as possible -- that seems to boost efficiency, for some reason.
The following 3 users liked this post by dibl:
coolbrazz (10-02-23), jollick (09-30-23), ravenuer (09-29-23)
Old 09-30-23, 07:26 AM
  #52  
msnow
Pit Crew
 
msnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: CA
Posts: 110
Received 38 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dibl
On a round trip Dayton > Indianapolis > Dayton (266 miles) on Tuesday of this week, plus ~50 miles of local short-trip driving, my F-Sport got 24.8 mpg, per gas pump refill calculation. I use the radar cruise control as much as possible -- that seems to boost efficiency, for some reason.
That’s interesting because on my 2022 450hL cruise control *reduces* my real-time mpg. It seems to accelerate at points where I would coast or just slightly feather acceleration. I suspect that’s the reason for my different results.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yipster222
LX - 3rd Gen (2008-2021)
20
09-06-13 03:16 AM
CJS57
ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012)
2
09-15-10 05:25 AM
Mcrusader
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
16
03-08-08 11:12 AM
foe84
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
44
08-23-06 03:29 PM
bwineland
LX - 1st and 2nd Gen (1996-2007)
1
03-07-02 07:22 AM



Quick Reply: Gas tank capacity??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:18 AM.