RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022) Discussion topics related to the 2016 and up RX350 and RX450h models

What fuel grade are you using in your RX350?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-20, 07:09 AM
  #211  
coolbrazz
Advanced
 
coolbrazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: NC
Posts: 545
Received 182 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

If you choose to use 87 only use top tier gas like Shell, BP, etc and add a fuel cleaner every oil change like Techron. Your engine will appreciate the kind gesture.
As a preference I like the way the car performs with higher grade gas to me its worth the few cents more in my area. We can debate this for weeks on whats recommended vs on really whats better for your $50k+ vehicle so I use nothing less than 89.
Just my 2cents...
Old 07-17-20, 07:55 AM
  #212  
exonw
Pit Crew
 
exonw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: AB
Posts: 124
Received 40 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the RX's 3.5-litre V6 engine normally aspirated that doesn't really need premium fuel? Every other non-turbo V6 engine in the market uses similar wordings regarding use of fuel (87 or higher) as I have a Honda Pilot V6. Premium fuel is required for engines with high compression ratios and are specifically mentioned in their User Manuals.

I believe using top-tier brands is best and a dash of fuel cleaning additives at any interval you decide. I only use Shell and if not available I go for other top-tiers.


Lexus RX350 UM statement:
You must only use unleaded gasoline. Select octane rating 87 (Research Octane Number 91) or higher. Use of unleaded gasoline with an octane rating lower than 87 may result in engine knocking. Persistent knocking can lead to engine damage. At minimum, the gasoline you use should meet the specifications of ASTM D4814 in the U.S.A.

Honda Pilot UM statement:
Fuel Recommendation - Your vehicle is designed to operate on unleaded gasoline with a pump octane number of 87 or higher. Use of a lower octane gasoline can cause a persistent, heavy, metallic rapping noise that can lead to engine damage.
Old 07-17-20, 08:08 AM
  #213  
jrobe
Pit Crew
 
jrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 137 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

I use 87 octane in my 2020 Rx 350 per the Owner's Manual.

My 2008 Rx 400h Hybrid recommended but didn't require Premium fuel in the Owner's Manual. After a lengthy discussion with my Lexus mechanic, I decided to use 87 octane fuel in that vehicle also. After 12 years and 150,000 miles, the car still ran perfect with no fuel related problems.

I elected not to buy a 202 Rx 450h Hybrid because it now requires premium fuel which completely negates the savings from the better mileage of the hybrid vehicle.
Old 07-17-20, 09:50 AM
  #214  
dibl
Instructor
 
dibl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 976
Received 689 Likes on 403 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike728
So, using higher octane than 87, is completely fine for your vehicle. It ends at that. Any perceived performance improvements are just perceived.
Actually, if you compare your gas mileage obtained from a full tank of 87 octane, (using the odometer and a calculator, not the figure on the instrument panel), to a full tank of 91 or 93 octane, under the same driving conditions, you can get beyond perception and have data.
The following users liked this post:
Cocal (07-17-20)
Old 07-17-20, 09:53 AM
  #215  
coolbrazz
Advanced
 
coolbrazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: NC
Posts: 545
Received 182 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Depends on the car. I had an 2008 Acura TL and it had a v6 non-turbo it needed 91-93.
If you did use 87 you had add an fuel additive.
Old 07-17-20, 05:48 PM
  #216  
Mike728
Lead Lap
 
Mike728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 4,816
Received 665 Likes on 497 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dibl
Actually, if you compare your gas mileage obtained from a full tank of 87 octane, (using the odometer and a calculator, not the figure on the instrument panel), to a full tank of 91 or 93 octane, under the same driving conditions, you can get beyond perception and have data.
In most parts of the country, Premium is also ethanol free. That alone can make a big difference. Premium is 60 cents/gal more here. I better be getting 25% better fuel economy, or it's a net loss.

I spent years throwing out extra cash for premium gas. It was only 20 cents/gal more at the time, but I can relate to the disease.
Old 07-17-20, 10:46 PM
  #217  
websurfer
Racer
 
websurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 1,785
Received 327 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coolbrazz
Depends on the car. I had an 2008 Acura TL and it had a v6 non-turbo it needed 91-93.
If you did use 87 you had add an fuel additive.
I mistakenly put 87 in the 2014 TL before and it was powerless when accelerating. After 1/4 tank used, I put more 91 and it was better then I put more 91 gas once it hit 1/4 tank. It was ok afterwards.

My Chevron gas station has a different layout for gas buttons than my 76 gas station so I got mixed up.
Old 07-18-20, 02:30 PM
  #218  
upnorth85
Rookie
 
upnorth85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: MN
Posts: 78
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Before buying the 2020 RXH 450, I had done some calculations and did find that even if one used the "required" Premium fuel in the Hybrid gas price wise one is still better off. I bought the Hybrid for the better power over the 350 Rx and I am happy I did. My wife's 2017 Rx 350 gives a mileage of 19 overall. My average on the 2020 Rxh 450 is a minimum of 26. This works out to around 36.4% better fuel efficiency over the 350. Today's gas price at my local Costco is 1.82 for regular and 2.18 for premium. The premium gas thus costs 19.8% more than the regular. So I am in the money. Thus if anyone is not buying a hybrid because of fuel gas being more expensive, this should not be a reason to not buy the hybrid. No doubt if you consider the extra cost for a Hybrid over a non Hybrid, then one will need to work out the payback period. I did not do that, because my intent was less engine noise and better power. If I did that type of analysis, I probably would have enough considered a Prius. However, after experiencing the very low sound when driving on the battery power, my next car is going to be an electric. If Lexus has this in 5 years that would be great, otherwise, I will need to consider other brands. Telsa's reliability is still poor and build quality too.
The following users liked this post:
mckdaddy (07-18-20)
Old 07-19-20, 07:10 AM
  #219  
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
mikemu30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,168
Received 2,555 Likes on 1,821 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by upnorth85
Before buying the 2020 RXH 450, I had done some calculations and did find that even if one used the "required" Premium fuel in the Hybrid gas price wise one is still better off. I bought the Hybrid for the better power over the 350 Rx and I am happy I did. My wife's 2017 Rx 350 gives a mileage of 19 overall. My average on the 2020 Rxh 450 is a minimum of 26. This works out to around 36.4% better fuel efficiency over the 350. Today's gas price at my local Costco is 1.82 for regular and 2.18 for premium. The premium gas thus costs 19.8% more than the regular. So I am in the money. Thus if anyone is not buying a hybrid because of fuel gas being more expensive, this should not be a reason to not buy the hybrid. No doubt if you consider the extra cost for a Hybrid over a non Hybrid, then one will need to work out the payback period. I did not do that, because my intent was less engine noise and better power. If I did that type of analysis, I probably would have enough considered a Prius. However, after experiencing the very low sound when driving on the battery power, my next car is going to be an electric. If Lexus has this in 5 years that would be great, otherwise, I will need to consider other brands. Telsa's reliability is still poor and build quality too.
Around my way, premium is generally 30% higher than reg 87.
Old 07-19-20, 07:48 AM
  #220  
jrobe
Pit Crew
 
jrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 137 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by upnorth85
Before buying the 2020 RXH 450, I had done some calculations and did find that even if one used the "required" Premium fuel in the Hybrid gas price wise one is still better off. I bought the Hybrid for the better power over the 350 Rx and I am happy I did. My wife's 2017 Rx 350 gives a mileage of 19 overall. My average on the 2020 Rxh 450 is a minimum of 26. This works out to around 36.4% better fuel efficiency over the 350. Today's gas price at my local Costco is 1.82 for regular and 2.18 for premium. The premium gas thus costs 19.8% more than the regular. So I am in the money. Thus if anyone is not buying a hybrid because of fuel gas being more expensive, this should not be a reason to not buy the hybrid. No doubt if you consider the extra cost for a Hybrid over a non Hybrid, then one will need to work out the payback period. I did not do that, because my intent was less engine noise and better power. If I did that type of analysis, I probably would have enough considered a Prius. However, after experiencing the very low sound when driving on the battery power, my next car is going to be an electric. If Lexus has this in 5 years that would be great, otherwise, I will need to consider other brands. Telsa's reliability is still poor and build quality too.
Today in my WI town, premium fuel is 34% higher than 87 octane fuel (70 cents per gallon more). This is very similar to when I bought my Rx350 last fall.

I miss the power and instant torque of my last Lexus Rx400h hybrid but the math doesn't work for me if I have to pay 34% more for fuel for the next 10 years even when the hybrid is now only $1000 more up front. The other complaint I had with the hybrid in a northern climate was that my mileage dropped dramatically in the winter. Basically, the engine can't run on battery power with the heater on which is about 4 months or more in Wisconsin. I also found that the mileage on the hybrid dropped each year that I owned the car. I suspect this was from aging of the batteries. I averaged 28 mpg in the first year and about 23 mpg by 8-10 years.

Last edited by jrobe; 07-19-20 at 07:54 AM.
The following users liked this post:
bamalam (07-19-20)
Old 07-20-20, 03:37 AM
  #221  
Freds430
Pole Position
 
Freds430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,568
Received 1,151 Likes on 745 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrobe
Today in my WI town, premium fuel is 34% higher than 87 octane fuel (70 cents per gallon more). This is very similar to when I bought my Rx350 last fall.

I miss the power and instant torque of my last Lexus Rx400h hybrid but the math doesn't work for me if I have to pay 34% more for fuel for the next 10 years even when the hybrid is now only $1000 more up front. The other complaint I had with the hybrid in a northern climate was that my mileage dropped dramatically in the winter. Basically, the engine can't run on battery power with the heater on which is about 4 months or more in Wisconsin. I also found that the mileage on the hybrid dropped each year that I owned the car. I suspect this was from aging of the batteries. I averaged 28 mpg in the first year and about 23 mpg by 8-10 years.
Our used ES 300h which at the time was two year old and certified was the same price of the ES350's on the lot. Our again two year old used CPO 2017 RX450h was $1,000 more then the RX 350's. These prices for our driving it was a no brainer. Probably on our tenth vehicle that required premium and do not use it. Always use the 87 regular. Tried premium a few times with no result of better gas mileage or performance. Remember it is a hybrid so performance for us is way down the list of priorities. Driven cars well over 150,000 miles with no engine problems. You are right about the cold weather. Here in NC, I lose two mpg in the winter. A plus is never have changed brake pads which is even more $$$$ savings. Lexus recommends a higher octane gas then 87 and not requires it.

Last edited by Freds430; 07-20-20 at 03:44 AM.
Old 07-20-20, 03:58 AM
  #222  
lgb0250
Intermediate
 
lgb0250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 398
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

LOL. What a waste. I do what the owner manual says and I’ve never been steered wrong. I trust trained engineers from the factory far more than any advice one will receive from a message board! Go figure. I put the required 87 in this glorified station wagon and save the 93 oct for something that can use it, like my Mustang!
Old 07-21-20, 08:10 PM
  #223  
cmmetcalf
10th Gear
 
cmmetcalf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 14
Received 23 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

See: Owners Manual Page 454 8.1 Specifications 2020 RX350

Octane rating 87 (research octane 91 or higher). 87 Octane is R+M/2 They want 91 or higher on the Research (RON) side. The motor method (MON) is more stressed way of rating octane. My Dad ran oil refineries his whole career and I spent one whole summer rating gasoline's for octane.

A good reference is the Colonial Pipeline specification for Reformulated Regular Gasoline Blendstock (intended to blended with 10% denatured fuel (ethanol):

"Minimum Colonial Pipeline Company CPC Product Specifications March 2016 1 of 1 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS 3.5.1 REFORMULATED REGULAR GASOLINE BLENDSTOCK (RBOB) FOR BLENDING WITH 10% DENATURED FUEL ETHANOL Cancels Previous Issues of F grades (92% PURITY) AS DEFINED IN ASTM D4806 This RBOB may not be combined with any other RBOB except RBOB having the same requirement for oxygenate type and amount. All parameters must be met after blending with denatured fuel ethanol unless noted. ALL F GRADE REQUIREMENTS (SEGREGATED AND FUNGIBLE)
RON ASTM D2699 Test Report No number cited
MON ASTM D2700 Test Test results minimum 82.0
(R+M)/2 Test Test results minimum 87.0
Benzene (vol%) ASTM D3606 1.30
Oxygen Content, weight % ASTM D5599 (See Note) 1,2,7,8
Aromatics (vol%) ASTM D5769 (See Note) Maximum 50 (See Note) 2
E200 (vol%) ASTM D86 Min 30 Max 70
E300 (vol%) ASTM D86 70 100
Olefins (vol%) ASTM D1319 [C],D6550 Max 25
Sulfur (ppmwt) ASTM D2622 Max 80 9
Non-VOC Controlled Requirements
RVP (psi) ASTM D5191 3 Grades F3,3F (Non-VOC Controlled) Max 11.5; F4,4F (Non-VOC Controlled) Max 13.5; F5,5F (Non-VOC Controlled) Max 15.0 VOC Controlled Requirements (Grades F1,F2,1F,2F, only)
Some content admitted Retrieved from https://das.nh.gov/purchasing/Docs/Bids/Attachments/RFB%202007-18%20Gasoline%20Specifications.pdf July 21, 2020

Specs are what is required to move product on the Colonial pipeline. Other pipelines checked are similar (Buckeye, Laurel, Norco, Wood River)

Lexus specs are crystal clear: 87 Octane (R+M is implied) with a minimum research octane (RON) of 91. That being the case: 91 + MON = 174/2 = 87(R+M/2) Motor Octane number( MON) must be a minimum of 83. Pipeline specs say 82 but R+M/2 must be 87.

Simply put: Run what you want--it is a matter solely of preference. My LS400/430s and SC00s and SC430 always ran better and got better mileage on 89 (mid grade in the South). Grade price differentials are now more than 10% of the previous grade costs around where I live. So, if I am not getting at least at 10% increase in mileage 2-2.5 MPG it is not good economics. All the major grades have the additive packages to keep your car running clean. (Excuse underline. I tried to get rid of it.)
The following 5 users liked this post by cmmetcalf:
bamalam (07-22-20), coolbrazz (07-22-20), GS350Miami (07-22-20), GSFRX350 (07-21-20), xxx350L (07-21-20)
Old 07-22-20, 08:50 AM
  #224  
coolbrazz
Advanced
 
coolbrazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: NC
Posts: 545
Received 182 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Very well explained. I've asked the Lexus tech during service before. He said that the on-board computer default tune is set for 87 grade fuel. One reason for that is at least 87 grade is available in every gas station in the US. It actually does more harm switching back & forth grades if done often. He also said if I prefer 89 just stick to it the computer will adjust, and 93 is a waste of money for the RX350. Pretty logical explanation, but enjoyed CMMetcalf fuel lesson.
Old 07-22-20, 09:42 PM
  #225  
dannnn
Pit Crew
 
dannnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: CO
Posts: 211
Received 79 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

tbh it doesnt really "matter" at least in the rx, most of the gas stations in america you already fill up at cheat the system.. The're private owners that pinch pennies like many businesses already do. Plenty of stories of someone filling up gas with a semi delivering some gas and the manager yelling to the driver if there's extra unleaded throw it in the premium tank. The trucker 9 times out of 10 agrees as if not he'll have to drive back and unload the gas which is a big hassle and paper work for everyone. But all gas in america at least is made from one manufacture that has pretty strict and stringent rules and requirements relating to octane levels, then bought by sibling companies which take it and add their own "secrete sauce" as in additives/detergents like shell, valero, cheveron, etc. The issue lies in private owners which all gas stations are, not being truthful and adding lower octane fuel in higher octane tanks.

But all modern gas made now days will run fine in any modern car unless its a "performance" car that needs later ignition as higher octane gas is less flammable. If your gas has ethanol in it, its already watered down so octane numbers do hold value for how the car runs. But in the rx I've filled from 85 to 91 with no difference lol


Quick Reply: What fuel grade are you using in your RX350?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:14 PM.