RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022) Discussion topics related to the 2016 and up RX350 and RX450h models

Lexus Lease Multiple Security Deposits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-18, 05:15 AM
  #1  
jpfromoh
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
jpfromoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oh
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Lexus Lease Multiple Security Deposits

Lexus allows you to make multiple refundable security deposits on their leases (up to 9 I think) to lower the payment. Looking at leasing a new 2018 RX. Are multiple security deposits a good idea? John
jpfromoh is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 05:46 AM
  #2  
golferjack
Advanced
 
golferjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Colorado
Posts: 501
Received 146 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

Unless you can deduct the cost of a vehicle via a business, leasing is a bad idea and a waste of money.
golferjack is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 05:52 AM
  #3  
ravenuer
Racer
 
ravenuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 1,770
Received 497 Likes on 375 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by golferjack
Unless you can deduct the cost of a vehicle via a business, leasing is a bad idea and a waste of money.
About 30% of new car shoppers would disagree with you.
ravenuer is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 06:30 AM
  #4  
golferjack
Advanced
 
golferjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Colorado
Posts: 501
Received 146 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

You are renting a car for X amount of time and at the end of the time you have no equity. How is that a good move, unless you can deduct part of it. Are all of the 30% shoppers able to deduct the cost or are they just "buying" more than they can afford?
golferjack is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 09:32 AM
  #5  
SC300Es
Pole Position
 
SC300Es's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,501
Received 64 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I don't think most people who lease care about whether they have equity or not. All they care is they have a car for half the monthly payments versus a finance and they get a new car every 2-3 years.

On the multiple deposits make sure your state allows this.
SC300Es is online now  
Old 10-26-18, 10:05 AM
  #6  
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
mikemu30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,147
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,815 Posts
Default

It's an awful model because the lessor absorbs the biggest chunk of depreciation - first three years or so. Lessees are typically 1) those that could not otherwise afford to purchase the car or 2) those that could easily afford it but choose to lease because they want something new every three years and can't be bothered properly maintaining it.
mikemu30 is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 12:02 PM
  #7  
ericsan13
Racer
 
ericsan13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 1,304
Received 176 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SC300Es
I don't think most people who lease care about whether they have equity or not. All they care is they have a car for half the monthly payments versus a finance and they get a new car every 2-3 years.

On the multiple deposits make sure your state allows this.
I will confirm with my smart CPA/tax accountant, but here's my understanding on why so many people lease when they own a business and are able to lease/buy a car underneath their legal entity.

Situation 1 - lease a car:
Your monthly payments offsets your revenue. You pay less income taxes.

Situation 2 - buy a car:
Your depreciation also offsets your revenue. You pay less income tax. However:
2a. If you sell your business for a profit, the amount you depreciated is subject to capital gains tax via Depreciation Recapture. Still better than paying income tax though.
2b. If you sell your business for enough of a loss, Depreciation Recapture does not apply to you.

Please feel free to correct me.
ericsan13 is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 12:10 PM
  #8  
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
mikemu30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,147
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,815 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ericsan13
I will confirm with my smart CPA/tax accountant, but here's my understanding on why so many people lease when they own a business and are able to lease/buy a car underneath their legal entity.

Situation 1 - lease a car:
Your monthly payments offsets your revenue. You pay less income taxes.

Situation 2 - buy a car:
Your depreciation also offsets your revenue. You pay less income tax. However:
2a. If you sell your business for a profit, the amount you depreciated is subject to capital gains tax via Depreciation Recapture. Still better than paying income tax though.
2b. If you sell your business for enough of a loss, Depreciation Recapture does not apply to you.

Please feel free to correct me.
It can get more complicated than that - is it a C Corp vs an S Corp - very different tax treatments? I get the charging it off to the business aspect though.
mikemu30 is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 01:41 PM
  #9  
golferjack
Advanced
 
golferjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Colorado
Posts: 501
Received 146 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

I totally agree with Mike and Eric. If you have a business your can afford to lease, because part of it is tax deductible, then there are those that just want a new car very often. That leaves those that lease because they want more than they can afford. Just hope those in the last category know what they are doing.
golferjack is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 04:37 PM
  #10  
Oldfart
Intermediate
 
Oldfart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ca
Posts: 325
Received 64 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by golferjack
You are renting a car for X amount of time and at the end of the time you have no equity. How is that a good move, unless you can deduct part of it. Are all of the 30% shoppers able to deduct the cost or are they just "buying" more than they can afford?
Simple calculations let me know what you think.

Buying 50K car vs. leasing 50K car

36 lease payment of $500 = $18,000 in payments and you have zero equity after 3 years of payments. Market value of the car is $32K at this point an you have an option to buy this car for $32K
36 loan payments of $850 = $30,600 in 3 years of ownership you gained $12,600 of equity (which is result of extra $350 payment per month). How is it better? At this point as an owner you probably will have to change full set of tires.
For example in California you will have to add 8% or $4K in sales tax that you will have to add to the loan amount and finance for the term of the loan.
Oldfart is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 05:04 PM
  #11  
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
mikemu30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,147
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,815 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oldfart
Simple calculations let me know what you think.

Buying 50K car vs. leasing 50K car

36 lease payment of $500 = $18,000 in payments and you have zero equity after 3 years of payments. Market value of the car is $32K at this point an you have an option to buy this car for $32K
36 loan payments of $850 = $30,600 in 3 years of ownership you gained $12,600 of equity (which is result of extra $350 payment per month). How is it better? At this point as an owner you probably will have to change full set of tires.
For example in California you will have to add 8% or $4K in sales tax that you will have to add to the loan amount and finance for the term of the loan.
Lessee is also responsible for tires and sales tax.
mikemu30 is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 05:38 PM
  #12  
joedaddy1
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
joedaddy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,883
Received 192 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

oh god.. not another lease vs buy with people who don't understand finance...

anyhow.. @jpfromoh .. MSD could be a great idea if your money factor is high and math works out. I put MSD on my recent lease (~$2500). Saved about $1500 in interest in the 3-year lease period.
Do the math.. Putting MSD down on a low-interest/MF period is useless and might not even be possible (under 1% MF).
joedaddy1 is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 05:47 PM
  #13  
joedaddy1
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
joedaddy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,883
Received 192 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikemu30
Lessee is also responsible for tires and sales tax.
correct. BUT!
* only if the tires are worn.. on cars like the RX, they won't wear out in the 36k lease period.
* Sales tax on the depreciation only. On a purchase the buyer pays full tax purchase price (most states, so big loss if you sell early)

There are killer deals to be found on lease over purchase.
For people who can't gasp the concept of leasing, I tell them "it's the option to pay ~$1k extra on a car to see if you like."
My GS was a great example where leasing worked.
$52k MSRP
$41k purchase price.

At the end of lease...
Buyout price $30k
Trade-in value $24k. So hypothetically, my discount was about $17k from the purchase price.
3 years, no tires, no nothing.

I was so glad, I leased this car instead of buying.
I would've lost another $6k-$8k after 3 years, if I purchased and sold this car. (it could go the other way, but in that case, you just buy out the lease)
joedaddy1 is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 05:56 PM
  #14  
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
mikemu30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,147
Received 2,541 Likes on 1,815 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joedaddy1
correct. BUT!
* only if the tires are worn.. on cars like the RX, they won't wear out in the 36k lease period.
* Sales tax on the depreciation only. On a purchase the buyer pays full tax purchase price (most states, so big loss if you sell early)

There are killer deals to be found on lease over purchase.
For people who can't gasp the concept of leasing, I tell them "it's the option to pay ~$1k extra on a car to see if you like."
My GS was a great example where leasing worked.
$52k MSRP
$41k purchase price.

At the end of lease...
Buyout price $30k
Trade-in value $24k. So hypothetically, my discount was about $17k from the purchase price.
3 years, no tires, no nothing.

I was so glad, I leased this car instead of buying.
I would've lost another $6k-$8k after 3 years, if I purchased and sold this car. (it could go the other way, but in that case, you just buy out the lease)
Youre dreaming if you think RX tires wont be worn at 30K+ miles. On purchase, you pay sales tax on full value but will later get credit on the trade value if you go that route. Hypothetical - thats the catch. Then the miles limits. No thanks. I want a car I can drive rather than watch it sit in the driveway.
mikemu30 is offline  
Old 10-26-18, 06:16 PM
  #15  
joedaddy1
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
joedaddy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,883
Received 192 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikemu30
Youre dreaming if you think RX tires wont be worn at 30K+ miles. On purchase, you pay sales tax on full value but will later get credit on the trade value if you go that route. Hypothetical - thats the catch. Then the miles limits. No thanks. I want a car I can drive rather than watch it sit in the driveway.
tax credits are in very limited number of states. Can’t speak to tires, every car and driver is different. You are probably right on 4RX tires since i don’t own one.

driving the extra miles are okay on a lease, too. You just pay for it at the end of the day. It’s similar to a purchase, you car will be worth less with higher miles.

I am not saying lease is always better than buying. It’s not. It’s better for maybe 10% of the people out there. The best $$ saving is to keep a reliable car for 7+ years. It doesn’t matter whether you lease or purchase at the start. You can always buy out your lease (I don’t think people understand that), no one in my family or circle of friends understand.
joedaddy1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Lexus Lease Multiple Security Deposits



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:01 PM.