RX - 5th Gen (2023-present) Discussion topics related to the 2023 and up RX models

Standard vs ML sound system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-23, 05:31 PM
  #31  
LexRuger
Pole Position
 
LexRuger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 2,043
Received 188 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steveg67
i feel like the subwoofer amp shuts off when volume is up
A lot of systems reduce bass at high volumes so you don't blow the speakers.
The following users liked this post:
FMY421 (05-14-23)
Old 05-14-23, 10:01 PM
  #32  
is350
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
is350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ca
Posts: 251
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dreamG
The stock sound system may be decent (I haven’t heard it) but unless paying more is a concern, but the ML upgrade is going to sound better. To me, the ML in my 500h sounds much better than 2016 MDX ELS and 2020 GS ML. It may be due to more speakers, their placement, and the cabin space of the new RX. I think it’s worth the upgrade if you enjoy music while driving.
No issues paying more for ML, but wish it didn’t require add-ons of options I don’t want.
Old 05-14-23, 10:09 PM
  #33  
Eagleboy99
Instructor
 
Eagleboy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 798
Received 276 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by is350
No issues paying more for ML, but wish it didn’t require add-ons of options I don’t want.
IN Canada, it is a cool $20,000 over the normally sold Premium model to get the ML stereo. No thanks.
Old 05-17-23, 05:38 PM
  #34  
tedmingo
5th Gear
 
tedmingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: FL
Posts: 5
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Not worth the 2K price

I've had the pleasure of owning both the 2023 Luxury and Premium + RX350 fwd turbo4. The ML audio system is definitely not worth the 2K price and all the other options that they force you to buy. I am always amused at how car audio is marketed by peak power and the number of speakers. The Mark Levinson system is only a brand name for marketing. The actual company was Harman that was sold to Samsung. You won't find a real ML amp to save your life in any car and ML never made speakers. But, if you want the bragging right to say you have an 1800 watt 17 speaker 3D surround sound audio system installed in the worst possible environment then hey, who am I to deny your pleasure.





The following 3 users liked this post by tedmingo:
Dogill (08-03-23), Paddler213 (03-20-24), StuM (01-25-24)
Old 05-17-23, 08:02 PM
  #35  
ronkelley
Instructor
 
ronkelley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: CO
Posts: 1,149
Received 143 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

--

Ahh! Party pooper!

--
Old 05-18-23, 04:58 AM
  #36  
Nibor
Rookie
 
Nibor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 27
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I’m actually very happy with the 21 speaker ML audio system on my 2023 RX 450H+ and find it comparable with the B&W in the Volvo (previous car). It is included in the top trim here.

Last edited by Nibor; 05-18-23 at 05:02 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Nibor:
FMY421 (05-18-23), jaxn1010 (08-03-23), Urlik (05-18-23)
Old 08-02-23, 02:05 PM
  #37  
is350
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
is350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ca
Posts: 251
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Ended up getting a 350h without ML system. The base system is good enough.
The following 4 users liked this post by is350:
aeromarkco (08-02-23), jamesss711 (06-12-24), lexusnyca (08-03-23), StuM (01-25-24)
Old 08-03-23, 07:18 AM
  #38  
BCBrent
Driver
 
BCBrent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: BC
Posts: 83
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by is350
How does the standard sound system sound? As much as I want the ML system, i can't justify spending for the extra add-on for the Premium+ trim just for the ML system.
You have to like the whole package to appreciate the ML system.

The ML system is much better in my 500H, then the ML in the 2013 450H we had

I have only had the system in the surround mode (ownership less than a week), I have yet to try it in the non-surround mode.

In the surround mode, with tracks that can make use of the soundstaging is quite nice.

Note: tracks where soundstaging is not optimum, then, it falls a bit flat.


Old 08-03-23, 01:21 PM
  #39  
GoBlue97
10th Gear
 
GoBlue97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: MD
Posts: 11
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I’ve been listening to the base sound for about a week in my rx350h. I use Apple Music with a usb connection in all my cars. To my ears, the lexus sounds a bit better than the base sound in my Audi, which was a bit better than the sound in my Honda Pilot Elite (with a claimed premium sound system). That is to say, all of them sound good to me but none of them blow me away. Admittedly, I’m not the best judge of sound and I’ve never owned a car with what I would consider a high end sound system. It helps that the Audi and the Lexus have great sound insulation because they sound better than the pilot.

Would I have paid for the ML? Probably, but given what we learned about Lexus’ allocation system and the relative scarcity and market adjustment of the rx350h, I found that reserving an rx350h with the ML system and our preferred color options at the dealer we wanted to use wasn’t realistic.
Old 08-03-23, 02:45 PM
  #40  
Dogill
Driver School Candidate
 
Dogill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: PA
Posts: 16
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I'm an old guy, consider myself an audiophile and have always tried to acquire the best sound systems at home and in-car. In past cars, I have typically opted for the premium sound systems when I could tell the difference enough to pay extra. I actually had the chance to compare the stock vs premium sound system in the 2023 RX350 - and found there to be no noticeable difference between the 2 while driving (which is the most important environment). While (while NOT driving) I could determine a slight bass advantage as well as slightly better surround sound performance due to number of additional speakers, while actually driving - they sounded virtually the same to me, overall - especially with surround sound off. Regardless, I don't use the surround sound feature as I find it compromises overall fidelity for my taste. Ended up with stock system and am very happy. Overall, one of the best auto sound systems I've experienced.
The following 3 users liked this post by Dogill:
GoBlue97 (08-03-23), jamesss711 (06-12-24), StuM (01-25-24)
Old 08-03-23, 02:46 PM
  #41  
ggebhardt
Pole Position
 
ggebhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,312
Received 502 Likes on 380 Posts
Default

I wish the ML system sounded as good as it costs. I have had the ML in multiple vehicles including a LX570 and LS and was not that impressed.
The following 2 users liked this post by ggebhardt:
StuM (01-25-24), Urlik (08-03-23)
Old 08-06-23, 01:15 AM
  #42  
happy1977
Instructor
 
happy1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: IN
Posts: 1,204
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dogill
I'm an old guy, consider myself an audiophile and have always tried to acquire the best sound systems at home and in-car. In past cars, I have typically opted for the premium sound systems when I could tell the difference enough to pay extra. I actually had the chance to compare the stock vs premium sound system in the 2023 RX350 - and found there to be no noticeable difference between the 2 while driving (which is the most important environment). While (while NOT driving) I could determine a slight bass advantage as well as slightly better surround sound performance due to number of additional speakers, while actually driving - they sounded virtually the same to me, overall - especially with surround sound off. Regardless, I don't use the surround sound feature as I find it compromises overall fidelity for my taste. Ended up with stock system and am very happy. Overall, one of the best auto sound systems I've experienced.
There is a difference in midrange sound and bass on ML due to more midrange speakers when surround is on. I dunno what source of audio you're listening to but using radio source to compare is bad. Plus tweaking the EQ and F/R can make a difference in sound quality/stage. The stock is just muffled and pale.
ML is still not better than aftermarket though like Focal.

Last edited by happy1977; 08-06-23 at 09:45 AM.
Old 08-06-23, 03:58 AM
  #43  
mathjak107
Pit Crew
 
mathjak107's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: ny
Posts: 133
Received 40 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

i much prefer the mark levinson system to stock .

audiophile here and musician …i also prefer no surround sound
Old 08-06-23, 05:11 AM
  #44  
BCBrent
Driver
 
BCBrent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: BC
Posts: 83
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mathjak107
i much prefer the mark levinson system to stock .

audiophile here and musician …i also prefer no surround sound
I'm a musician as well, playing bass (does that count??) Lol!

I'll have to try without the surround sound soon.

What tracks does everyone try to test the system, and in which mode?

It doesn't really matter which system everyone prefers, the RX comes with what it comes with, and the price point that works for them.



Old 08-06-23, 05:22 AM
  #45  
mathjak107
Pit Crew
 
mathjak107's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: ny
Posts: 133
Received 40 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

i am a drummer so you know how it goes , there are musicians and then there are drummers , ha ha .

i like brian culbertson stuff , steely dan , super tramp for evaluating systems
The following 2 users liked this post by mathjak107:
BCBrent (08-06-23), DEL92 (01-26-24)


Quick Reply: Standard vs ML sound system



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 AM.