5th gen RX merged rumor and launch threads
#106
I just don't see the RX getting only 4 cyl engines, even if they are turbo charged. I don't think there are any other luxury or semi-luxury SUV's that only have 4 cylinder power that are the size of an RX - maybe Jag, but not like they are on a lot of buyer's radar. I realize the German SUV's'-Q5, GLC300, X3 may be compared, but I think of them more of an NX competitor, as they are smaller and lighter than the RX.
The following users liked this post:
GS350Miami (12-12-21)
#108
I just don't see the RX getting only 4 cyl engines, even if they are turbo charged. I don't think there are any other luxury or semi-luxury SUV's that only have 4 cylinder power that are the size of an RX - maybe Jag, but not like they are on a lot of buyer's radar. I realize the German SUV's'-Q5, GLC300, X3 may be compared, but I think of them more of an NX competitor, as they are smaller and lighter than the RX.
#110
Yes, I forgot about the base engines in the MB & Audi, but I believe they also offer a V6 as an upgrade. As mentioned elsewhere my concern is if they use the same engine(s) as the NX, that unless Lexus performs a miracle and drastically reduces the weight, the new RX will be noticeably slower than the rest of the competition. My 14 RX is fine for merging and passing but I don't think I would want something that was any slower, especially at the price point of the RX.
#111
Germans offer way more powertrain options. Sure they start with a 4-cyl but go up to turbo V8 if you're willing to pay for it.
RX with a twin turbo V6 from Tundra should happen. If turbo 4-cyl happens for sure N/A V6 will not, but a turbo V6 I could see being offered in North America.
RX with a twin turbo V6 from Tundra should happen. If turbo 4-cyl happens for sure N/A V6 will not, but a turbo V6 I could see being offered in North America.
#112
Any idea when we might start seeing prototypes, possibly getting some more leaked info on the 2023 RX? The Detroit auto show is in Sept (barring cancellation again) but hoping for info prior to then.
#113
My concern is that turbo 4's typically require premium fuel, a LOT more $ here in Canada. That and every time I drove a loaner NX turbo, the mileage was not that much different than my V6, so I feel the cost of operation will be higher with a turbo 4.
Also, judging by the selling prices for the NX, the price next gen RX may be a shocker. Top of the line NX450H+ FSport 3 is listed at my local dealer at $80,950.00. WOW! That's before delivery, prep, and taxes (13% here).
Also, judging by the selling prices for the NX, the price next gen RX may be a shocker. Top of the line NX450H+ FSport 3 is listed at my local dealer at $80,950.00. WOW! That's before delivery, prep, and taxes (13% here).
#114
Racer
My concern is that turbo 4's typically require premium fuel, a LOT more $ here in Canada. That and every time I drove a loaner NX turbo, the mileage was not that much different than my V6, so I feel the cost of operation will be higher with a turbo 4.
Also, judging by the selling prices for the NX, the price next gen RX may be a shocker. Top of the line NX450H+ FSport 3 is listed at my local dealer at $80,950.00. WOW! That's before delivery, prep, and taxes (13% here).
Also, judging by the selling prices for the NX, the price next gen RX may be a shocker. Top of the line NX450H+ FSport 3 is listed at my local dealer at $80,950.00. WOW! That's before delivery, prep, and taxes (13% here).
They use a turbo for 2 reasons, W/O it the vehicle is a pig, dead on the road and when testing (not in real life condition) it shows a certain fuel economy on paper which multiplied by the number of units give the manufacturer a total amount of savings. Nobody drives the way they test.
This the Governments (all of them) like.
#116
Turbochargers have a well-earned reputation for short lives on automobiles. I'll have to see multiple and reliable reports of 200K mile turbos before I'll even consider one.
The following users liked this post:
jollick (01-28-22)
#117
Have you guys test driven GLE or Q7's 2.0T? They seem very quick and faster than the RX. They even weigh more. I think 2.0T if done right will be more than sufficient for this weight.
#118
FWIW, if Lexus puts a 4 banger in the RX, I'll guess it'll likely be the same 2.5L as in the new NX.
#120
Like most here, I don't drive a Lexus RX because it's a race car; I drive it because it's reliable, retains value and is a reasonable price to service. How many reports have been published about the VW 2.0T engine using oil? I believe it's the same engine in the Audi as well. As for the Mercedes; no idea but I'd never own one. All the German cars are overrated in my view. Had an Audi 4000S Quattro in the late 80's which quickly became a money pit once the warranty expired. In the end, a wrecker gave me more for it than a dealer would in trade at the time.
FWIW, if Lexus puts a 4 banger in the RX, I'll guess it'll likely be the same 2.5L as in the new NX.
FWIW, if Lexus puts a 4 banger in the RX, I'll guess it'll likely be the same 2.5L as in the new NX.