2023 RX350 4-cylinder Engine
#1
10th Gear
Thread Starter
2023 RX350 4-cylinder Engine
I have owned several RX350s over the years and am in the market for my next car. Normally it would be an easy decision to refresh my RX, but Toyota's decision to eliminate the 6-cylinder engine may cost them my business. Based on my own experience with numerous rentals and other cars, a 4-cylinder engine is noisy, lacks on-demand power, is not smooth at lower speeds and has a reduced lifespan. I have noticed Toyota's marketing collateral draws little attention to the engine (other than a cursory "turbo-charged" mention). Instead, they focus on everything else like comfort, tech, etc. which is secondary to the powertrain. I have seen YouTube videos of people driving the car...yes, they love the comfort, but many lament the powertrain. Before I go any further in this journey, I'd like to get your feedback:
1. Is the engine as quiet as the 3.5 6-cylinder? I'm interested in both city and highway driving.
2. How would you rate the on-demand power? Today, a person ran a red light and nearly hit me. I stomped on the gas and was able to instantly jerk my car out of the way. Without the instant power, I would likely be in the hospital right now. Will the new turbo-charged 4-cylinder do this?
3. Is the 4-cylinder engine as smooth as the 6-cylinder? The value of Lexus is "quiet and smooth". Can the new engine deliver this?
4. The weight of the 2023 RX is similar enough to previous models. A 4-cylinder engine will work harder than a 6-cylinder to support the vehicle load (made worse by a towing package) -- likely lowering the engine's lifespan. A 4-cylinder mini-van is a good example of this. What are your thoughts?
Thanks in advance.
1. Is the engine as quiet as the 3.5 6-cylinder? I'm interested in both city and highway driving.
2. How would you rate the on-demand power? Today, a person ran a red light and nearly hit me. I stomped on the gas and was able to instantly jerk my car out of the way. Without the instant power, I would likely be in the hospital right now. Will the new turbo-charged 4-cylinder do this?
3. Is the 4-cylinder engine as smooth as the 6-cylinder? The value of Lexus is "quiet and smooth". Can the new engine deliver this?
4. The weight of the 2023 RX is similar enough to previous models. A 4-cylinder engine will work harder than a 6-cylinder to support the vehicle load (made worse by a towing package) -- likely lowering the engine's lifespan. A 4-cylinder mini-van is a good example of this. What are your thoughts?
Thanks in advance.
The following 2 users liked this post by Vguitarist:
CrimsonRvn (03-18-24),
ThaPhenom (12-18-23)
#2
Pole Position
I have owned several RX350s over the years and am in the market for my next car. Normally it would be an easy decision to refresh my RX, but Toyota's decision to eliminate the 6-cylinder engine may cost them my business. Based on my own experience with numerous rentals and other cars, a 4-cylinder engine is noisy, lacks on-demand power, is not smooth at lower speeds and has a reduced lifespan. I have noticed Toyota's marketing collateral draws little attention to the engine (other than a cursory "turbo-charged" mention). Instead, they focus on everything else like comfort, tech, etc. which is secondary to the powertrain. I have seen YouTube videos of people driving the car...yes, they love the comfort, but many lament the powertrain. Before I go any further in this journey, I'd like to get your feedback:
1. Is the engine as quiet as the 3.5 6-cylinder? I'm interested in both city and highway driving.
2. How would you rate the on-demand power? Today, a person ran a red light and nearly hit me. I stomped on the gas and was able to instantly jerk my car out of the way. Without the instant power, I would likely be in the hospital right now. Will the new turbo-charged 4-cylinder do this?
3. Is the 4-cylinder engine as smooth as the 6-cylinder? The value of Lexus is "quiet and smooth". Can the new engine deliver this?
4. The weight of the 2023 RX is similar enough to previous models. A 4-cylinder engine will work harder than a 6-cylinder to support the vehicle load (made worse by a towing package) -- likely lowering the engine's lifespan. A 4-cylinder mini-van is a good example of this. What are your thoughts?
Thanks in advance.
1. Is the engine as quiet as the 3.5 6-cylinder? I'm interested in both city and highway driving.
2. How would you rate the on-demand power? Today, a person ran a red light and nearly hit me. I stomped on the gas and was able to instantly jerk my car out of the way. Without the instant power, I would likely be in the hospital right now. Will the new turbo-charged 4-cylinder do this?
3. Is the 4-cylinder engine as smooth as the 6-cylinder? The value of Lexus is "quiet and smooth". Can the new engine deliver this?
4. The weight of the 2023 RX is similar enough to previous models. A 4-cylinder engine will work harder than a 6-cylinder to support the vehicle load (made worse by a towing package) -- likely lowering the engine's lifespan. A 4-cylinder mini-van is a good example of this. What are your thoughts?
Thanks in advance.
I previously had the old V6 in my 2020RX. This new setup does feel just a little different, but the improved ride and comfort negates the slightly louder engine. Power is adequate up the hills of Pittsburgh.
My 4000+lb RX amazingly gets almost double the MPGs as the old car, on regular gas. It’s not a racecar, but neither was the old RX. That’s not why people buy them. They buy them for quiet, comfort, reliability and now, fuel economy. This car is a winner on all accounts and will continue to be a sales leader for Lexus if they can crank out the hybrid versions. The gas car actually gets about 10% lower fuel economy than the old V6 once you adjust for 20% more costly premium gas. But both the hybrid and non hybrid RX sticker out the same. Although in the real world, I think the hybrid will fetch more/discount less.
The following 2 users liked this post by daryll40:
ggebhardt (03-17-23),
JRey350hou (02-21-23)
#3
Turbo
There are a lot of very quiet and responsive turbo engines out there with tremendous reliability. My 17 year old Volvo has a terrific 5 cylinder turbo engine that I really like (more than my 2013 RX’s 6 cylinder ) very reliable as well. We’ll see how Lexus executes this but they certainly have the expertise to do it properly. If my car ever arrives reports shall be filed!
#4
How well did you adapt to driving a V6 after growing up with V8's? A V6 has compromises to run smoothly
compared to the intrinsically balanced V8 (two 4 stroke in-lines joined at 90 degrees). Grandpa scowled at
the thought of a "6 pot" under the hood after having a Rocket 88 move him.
Same sort of thing happening now as we move from split pin crank V6's to "4 bangers"
The RX 350 turbo 4 has 317 lb./ft. of torque @ 1700 RPM
while the 3.5L V6 has 265 lb./ft. @ 4700 RPM. Ever see an RX being driven at 4700 RPM?
The turbo has a Twin Scroll design that directs pressure from two sections to only two cylinders
each, keeps the flow and pressure up and response time very low.
compared to the intrinsically balanced V8 (two 4 stroke in-lines joined at 90 degrees). Grandpa scowled at
the thought of a "6 pot" under the hood after having a Rocket 88 move him.
Same sort of thing happening now as we move from split pin crank V6's to "4 bangers"
The RX 350 turbo 4 has 317 lb./ft. of torque @ 1700 RPM
while the 3.5L V6 has 265 lb./ft. @ 4700 RPM. Ever see an RX being driven at 4700 RPM?
The turbo has a Twin Scroll design that directs pressure from two sections to only two cylinders
each, keeps the flow and pressure up and response time very low.
#5
Pole Position
How well did you adapt to driving a V6 after growing up with V8's? A V6 has compromises to run smoothly
compared to the intrinsically balanced V8 (two 4 stroke in-lines joined at 90 degrees). Grandpa scowled at
the thought of a "6 pot" under the hood after having a Rocket 88 move him.
Same sort of thing happening now as we move from split pin crank V6's to "4 bangers"
The RX 350 turbo 4 has 317 lb./ft. of torque @ 1700 RPM
while the 3.5L V6 has 265 lb./ft. @ 4700 RPM. Ever see an RX being driven at 4700 RPM?
The turbo has a Twin Scroll design that directs pressure from two sections to only two cylinders
each, keeps the flow and pressure up and response time very low.
compared to the intrinsically balanced V8 (two 4 stroke in-lines joined at 90 degrees). Grandpa scowled at
the thought of a "6 pot" under the hood after having a Rocket 88 move him.
Same sort of thing happening now as we move from split pin crank V6's to "4 bangers"
The RX 350 turbo 4 has 317 lb./ft. of torque @ 1700 RPM
while the 3.5L V6 has 265 lb./ft. @ 4700 RPM. Ever see an RX being driven at 4700 RPM?
The turbo has a Twin Scroll design that directs pressure from two sections to only two cylinders
each, keeps the flow and pressure up and response time very low.
#6
My wife just bought an RX350 and I bought an ES350. I know they are different models and different transmissions, but her engine in my opinion is more quiet than mine. I don't think its loud at all. Its very smooth and has plenty of power. She's very happy with it. I havent driven it myself yet, but have been in the passenger seat and am impressed. She says she doesn't feel any turbo lag either.
The following users liked this post:
JohnPDX (04-05-23)
#7
My 2016 had the V6 and I much prefer it over the Turbo 4 in my 2023 RX. They advertise better gas nileage (1mpg better than the V6) but fail to mention that the Turbo 4 requires premium gas. In my location, premium gas is almost $1.00 more than regular.
The turbo 4 doesn't have the instant power of the V6 and is noisier in town driving. I wish I had my 2016 w/V6 back.
The turbo 4 doesn't have the instant power of the V6 and is noisier in town driving. I wish I had my 2016 w/V6 back.
The following 3 users liked this post by madmax24:
Trending Topics
#8
My 2016 had the V6 and I much prefer it over the Turbo 4 in my 2023 RX. They advertise better gas nileage (1mpg better than the V6) but fail to mention that the Turbo 4 requires premium gas. In my location, premium gas is almost $1.00 more than regular.
The turbo 4 doesn't have the instant power of the V6 and is noisier in town driving. I wish I had my 2016 w/V6 back.
The turbo 4 doesn't have the instant power of the V6 and is noisier in town driving. I wish I had my 2016 w/V6 back.
#9
#11
Our point of reference is our 2013 RX which had the 6 cylinder engine. The new four cylinder turbo is, compared to that, far, far superior. Way more responsive, quieter, better paired with its transmission. We are pleasantly very surprised.
#12
Savagegeese called this engine rattle-y in his review and I 100% disagree. I feel like he just said it because its a talking point when a popular car switches to a turbo 4.
This is by far the most refined Turbo 4 ive heard in a long time. The closest one to this is Audi's 20+ year old 2.0T which has been refined over and over and over and this brand new Lexus unit is definitely on par. Way, way more refined than BMW's turbo 4 for sure.
Please stop calling them V-4. They are referred to as I-4 or Turbo 4. There are no V4s in cars. Just I4 and H4
This is by far the most refined Turbo 4 ive heard in a long time. The closest one to this is Audi's 20+ year old 2.0T which has been refined over and over and over and this brand new Lexus unit is definitely on par. Way, way more refined than BMW's turbo 4 for sure.
Please stop calling them V-4. They are referred to as I-4 or Turbo 4. There are no V4s in cars. Just I4 and H4
The following 5 users liked this post by Vanguard:
BCBrent (03-23-23),
daryll40 (03-23-23),
JohnPDX (04-05-23),
neilsarkar (03-23-23),
Urlik (03-23-23)
#13
Savagegeese called this engine rattle-y in his review and I 100% disagree. I feel like he just said it because its a talking point when a popular car switches to a turbo 4.
This is by far the most refined Turbo 4 ive heard in a long time. The closest one to this is Audi's 20+ year old 2.0T which has been refined over and over and over and this brand new Lexus unit is definitely on par. Way, way more refined than BMW's turbo 4 for sure.
Please stop calling them V-4. They are referred to as I-4 or Turbo 4. There are no V4s in cars. Just I4 and H4
This is by far the most refined Turbo 4 ive heard in a long time. The closest one to this is Audi's 20+ year old 2.0T which has been refined over and over and over and this brand new Lexus unit is definitely on par. Way, way more refined than BMW's turbo 4 for sure.
Please stop calling them V-4. They are referred to as I-4 or Turbo 4. There are no V4s in cars. Just I4 and H4
I feel like the day of Youtube car reviewers are nearing an end.
They are now rarely accurate and in many cases biased. Car makers schmooze and booz them, invite them to retreats to review a car in few minutes and create an "unbiased" content.....
Others just need to create content to make money and they base those on few minutes of test drives..
Just my opinion.
The following 4 users liked this post by toyotaman7:
#15
Pole Position