is 12,000 to much for a 1993 SC400
11-18-04, 03:31 PM
#18
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jboy
Anyone know whether the changes in 1998 (bigger engine, 5 speed auto, etc) are worth a price premium? Do they noticably effect tha car (quierter, smoother, quicker ?)
Anyone know whether the changes in 1998 (bigger engine, 5 speed auto, etc) are worth a price premium? Do they noticably effect tha car (quierter, smoother, quicker ?)
The 99+ cars had much upgraded interiors, with a three-spoke wheel and more wood, classy shifter and better guage layout.
It really depends on what you care about. If performance and interior are top concerns, these years are worth the premium. If used-car value and reliability are main concerns, get an older one.
11-18-04, 03:40 PM
#19
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by THE_CEO
keep your eyes open in the SC forum...it was posted a few days ago..
CEO
keep your eyes open in the SC forum...it was posted a few days ago..
CEO
As for our good friend John (R.I.P.)........well see for yourself: http://www.lingenfelter.com/home.asp
More than half his cars were either turboed or supercharged and I'm sure he didn't use carburators for those, and therefore used electronics to his benefit.
I wouldn't call him a traitor but that phrase is used way too much considering the guy who said it was eventually swayed towards FI.
Happy Boostin!
~Alan
11-19-04, 08:47 AM
#20
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ca
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Choices, choices
Hi,
I have found a few cars I am interested in and want some opinions.
Car 1) 1993 SC400, 50,000 miles, white, very clean, family member has done maintenance for entire ownership, $12,000
Car 2) 1997 SC 400. 87,000 miles, red-maroon, clean, unknown maintenance history, $16,000
Car 3) 1998 SC 400, 88,000 miles, black, clean, unknown maintenance history, clean CARFAX report, $18,000.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Jerry
I have found a few cars I am interested in and want some opinions.
Car 1) 1993 SC400, 50,000 miles, white, very clean, family member has done maintenance for entire ownership, $12,000
Car 2) 1997 SC 400. 87,000 miles, red-maroon, clean, unknown maintenance history, $16,000
Car 3) 1998 SC 400, 88,000 miles, black, clean, unknown maintenance history, clean CARFAX report, $18,000.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Jerry
11-19-04, 08:51 AM
#21
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ca
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by broman
The 98+ changes make a big difference to the driving experience. 98+ cars are noticeably faster and the 5-speed is a large improvement in response over the 4-speed.
The 99+ cars had much upgraded interiors, with a three-spoke wheel and more wood, classy shifter and better guage layout.
It really depends on what you care about. If performance and interior are top concerns, these years are worth the premium. If used-car value and reliability are main concerns, get an older one.
The 98+ changes make a big difference to the driving experience. 98+ cars are noticeably faster and the 5-speed is a large improvement in response over the 4-speed.
The 99+ cars had much upgraded interiors, with a three-spoke wheel and more wood, classy shifter and better guage layout.
It really depends on what you care about. If performance and interior are top concerns, these years are worth the premium. If used-car value and reliability are main concerns, get an older one.
jerry
11-19-04, 09:39 AM
#23
93 seems overpriced, even with the miles on it. I'd go with the 97 for $16,000 and just have it checked out. The 97 and 98 will have upgraded parts in the engines, I believe they are 290 or 300hp over the 250hp of the 93.
11-19-04, 11:33 AM
#28
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jboy
Why is the reliability worse on the 98 and on cars?
Why is the reliability worse on the 98 and on cars?
Of your choices, #3 will be the most fun to drive.
You might consider #1 (but haggle if you can) IF the interior is *perfect* (interior trim and upholstery are about the only parts of these cars that show wear, and they are a pain to replace), and you are satisfied with the power.
Last edited by broman; 11-19-04 at 11:35 AM.
11-19-04, 11:50 AM
#29
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by O. L. T.
i wouldn't give more than 6k
i wouldn't give more than 6k
6K will buy you a '92 with 200,000 miles on it.
A mint '93 with those miles is well worth at least 11K.
Hhmmm...A mint, low mileage Lexus SC400 or a Chevy Aveo? Tough one.
11-20-04, 12:01 AM
#30
Keeper of the light
iTrader: (17)
Nope, because that's all it'll go through the auction for. THEN it'll be sold for 10k or so on a lot or private sale.
I could be spoiled since my buddy goes to the ATL auction every week
I could be spoiled since my buddy goes to the ATL auction every week