new times for lexus..
#6
Originally Posted by Inabj2
What I find interesting is how my automatic SC300's trap speed are within 2 mph, but his low end is much better.
Perhaps tells me that the SC400 is torquier then the SC300 but almost make same hp?
Perhaps tells me that the SC400 is torquier then the SC300 but almost make same hp?
#7
I was running between 14.98 - 15.10 in my stock 95 sc4, according to my Gtechpro.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...1&page=3&pp=15
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...1&page=3&pp=15
Trending Topics
#8
I was running between 14.98 - 15.10 in my stock 95 sc4, according to my Gtechpro.
the 0 to 60 times were off by a second at times.
Example....it was saying my 1/4mile time was 4/10ths of a sec faster than what the Manufacturer and Road and Track were posting on the 3000GT VR4. Those numbers a padded from the get go, Pro driver, closed track, perfecto weather, less air in tires. I was on a BFI farm road in the middle of summer.
Don't trust your Gtech over what the track-gun says.
#9
15.7 at 90mph?
Shouldn't a V8 with 260+hp be a bit faster than this?
Seems kinda slow to me. Doesnt a stock sc300 net these ET's and trap speeds too?
-Allen
Shouldn't a V8 with 260+hp be a bit faster than this?
Seems kinda slow to me. Doesnt a stock sc300 net these ET's and trap speeds too?
-Allen
Last edited by Blk97SC300; 03-08-06 at 12:25 PM.
#10
Oh yes dont remind me. I ran a 17.1 on street tires. No traction whatsoever. I guarantee you will run better times if you run slicks in the rear. After that 17.1 I swore I was never going to the track again with a pair of slicks.
#11
Originally Posted by Blk97SC300
15.7 at 90mph?
Shouldn't a V8 with 260+hp be a bit faster than this?
Seems kinda slow to me. Doesnt a stock sc300 net these ET's and trap speeds too?
-Allen
Shouldn't a V8 with 260+hp be a bit faster than this?
Seems kinda slow to me. Doesnt a stock sc300 net these ET's and trap speeds too?
-Allen
#13
Don't worry about the reaction time, it has nothing to do with your ET or MPH. Only worry about that if you are doing real track racing, just to see what it does, RT doesn't matter.
2.3' is kind of bad but not horrible. Every tenth you take off the 60', you gain a 2 tenth deduction on you ET. Start modding...
2.3' is kind of bad but not horrible. Every tenth you take off the 60', you gain a 2 tenth deduction on you ET. Start modding...
#14
Originally Posted by BrownDuckz
My low mileage SC300 [Auto] went 17.0@83mph. This was with bigger brakes, suspension, tt wheels, 245/275 rubber.
And my trap speeds were 4- 5mph faster, its amazing the differnce unsprung weight can do to the car! My tires are falken 451-GR-betas 225/16/50s.
My best 60's were in the high 2.6's almost 2.7s... With a severe bog of the launch every time, this is due to the no low end grunt and long gears. I can totally see losing and entire second when I convert to manual.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
supradean
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
12
02-08-07 11:41 AM
Phierce
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
18
11-03-01 12:49 AM