I now hate cats.
10-29-07 | 12:48 PM
#31
i always catch those little s.o.b's on my car. they leave foot prints all over the place, scratches.....
i hate them but unfortunatley i dont think i could bring myself to give them a nice swift kick......
i hate them but unfortunatley i dont think i could bring myself to give them a nice swift kick......
10-29-07 | 01:02 PM
#32
oh man, that sucks!! I also get cat paws on my car, for whatever reason it is, they always get my car, those mfn cats!! but they have never scratched before. im bringing my car home with fresh paint, so im going to have to think of somehting to prevent those sucker from scratching my fresh paint. good luck getting that taken care of bro
10-29-07 | 01:10 PM
#34
Pole Position
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: OK
So you think you can allow your dogs to attack an essentially helpless cat and not incur any consequences as a result? Pretty unlikely. Actually, since my gf is an attorney, I might just wage a legal war on you instead with the intention of draining your bank account. I don't think many well selected civil case jurors would look kindly on a huge dog attacking a helpless animal. Hopefully your neighbors will do the same to you should your dogs inflict harm on their animals. Good luck with your arcaic antics and dog attacks.
10-29-07 | 01:53 PM
#35
Pit Crew
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 147
Likes: 14
From: ca
How is a cat with claws "helpless?"
If it was a cat vs a chiwawa, that might be a different story ha ha.
10-29-07 | 02:18 PM
#39
Well, if you have a family and don't own a house (which implies you would have a garage 99% of the time), that is pretty poor planning, so maybe you deserve cat scratches for being a loser lol. As far as useless animals go, I know many humans that would qualify as such.
So you think you can allow your dogs to attack an essentially helpless cat and not incur any consequences as a result? Pretty unlikely. Actually, since my gf is an attorney, I might just wage a legal war on you instead with the intention of draining your bank account. I don't think many well selected civil case jurors would look kindly on a huge dog attacking a helpless animal. Hopefully your neighbors will do the same to you should your dogs inflict harm on their animals. Good luck with your arcaic antics and dog attacks.
So you think you can allow your dogs to attack an essentially helpless cat and not incur any consequences as a result? Pretty unlikely. Actually, since my gf is an attorney, I might just wage a legal war on you instead with the intention of draining your bank account. I don't think many well selected civil case jurors would look kindly on a huge dog attacking a helpless animal. Hopefully your neighbors will do the same to you should your dogs inflict harm on their animals. Good luck with your arcaic antics and dog attacks.
By law, at least in the area in which I live, there is a city ordinance that all cats, if outside, should be on a leash. If a cat is not on a leash, thus breaking the law, and damaging my property, then yes, I do hope this "essentially helpless creature" feels the wrath of a .22 or a dogs teeth. I am pretty sure you and your girlfriend could wage all the "war" you want, but at the end of the day, if your cat is not on a leash, is on my property, and destroying my property, then you don't have much of a leg to stand on.
Not to mention that my home insurance would cover this, not me. So how you are planning on draining my bank account still confuses me.
Your argument is flawed, and you are ill-informed. Go ask your girlfriend for a better defense.
PS - Smaller animals being killed by larger animals is not what I may call "archaic", rather I would term it "natures workings."
Jonny
10-29-07 | 02:57 PM
#40
Pit Crew
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 147
Likes: 14
From: ca
LOL. I have both a family and a house. I also have more than 2 cars. And yes I agree, many humans are more useless than cats.
By law, at least in the area in which I live, there is a city ordinance that all cats, if outside, should be on a leash. If a cat is not on a leash, thus breaking the law, and damaging my property, then yes, I do hope this "essentially helpless creature" feels the wrath of a .22 or a dogs teeth. I am pretty sure you and your girlfriend could wage all the "war" you want, but at the end of the day, if your cat is not on a leash, is on my property, and destroying my property, then you don't have much of a leg to stand on.
Not to mention that my home insurance would cover this, not me. So how you are planning on draining my bank account still confuses me.
Your argument is flawed, and you are ill-informed. Go ask your girlfriend for a better defense.
PS - Smaller animals being killed by larger animals is not what I may call "archaic", rather I would term it "natures workings."
By law, at least in the area in which I live, there is a city ordinance that all cats, if outside, should be on a leash. If a cat is not on a leash, thus breaking the law, and damaging my property, then yes, I do hope this "essentially helpless creature" feels the wrath of a .22 or a dogs teeth. I am pretty sure you and your girlfriend could wage all the "war" you want, but at the end of the day, if your cat is not on a leash, is on my property, and destroying my property, then you don't have much of a leg to stand on.
Not to mention that my home insurance would cover this, not me. So how you are planning on draining my bank account still confuses me.
Your argument is flawed, and you are ill-informed. Go ask your girlfriend for a better defense.
PS - Smaller animals being killed by larger animals is not what I may call "archaic", rather I would term it "natures workings."
Well you really have nothing to worry about then, Dx3. Just park the cars you care about the most in the garage. Duh!
Interesting, that cats must be on a leash where you live. However, the majority of cities/counties, to my knowledge, have no such ordinance (including mine).
Your homeowners insurance covers financial penalties associated with criminal and tort law offenses committed on your property? Wow, that must be a fantastic policy. OJ Simpson should have had one of those; that way he wouldn't have to worry about the $25M+ civil suit(s) from the Goldman's and the Brown's! I'll have to look into one of those. Then I can act any way I want with fiscal impunity. Sweet!
Sicking your dogs on a cat, shooting a cat with a .22 for simply being on your property? That is, by almost any standard, incompatible with the level of civility required to function successfully in modern American society and are clearly examples of irrational and psychotic acts. Even if you kill one cat, there are probably more to take it's place. It's a futile, ridiculous, and potentially incriminating battle.
What if a little kid, (who has more intelligence than a cat, and therefore should know to stay off your property) that should lawfully be under the watch of a supervisory individual, were roaming around on/ unintentionally damaging your property? Would you sick your dogs on or shoot him/her? According to your argument, that would be permissible. Simply because there is a law prohibiting a given circumstance doesn't mean it is up to you to carry out your prejudiced idea of vigilante "justice." Those are functions often best served by the police and legal system.
PS: Smaller animals being killed by larger animals is "natures workings?" Lol, ok. Humans are obviously animals (simply more intelligent and therefore more prolific than many other animals). Can a fat man go around killing skinny people? Can we let the lions and tigers out of the zoo to roam around and eat people? After all, it’s just "natures workings," and it’s A-ok.
All: Sorry for taking this thread a little off topic (although still loosely related). Dx3 just infuriated me with his apparent lack of civility and blatent disregard for life, regardless of whether it is human or not. This will be my last reply to Dx3 on this topic.
Last edited by nkx1; 10-29-07 at 03:56 PM.
10-29-07 | 03:28 PM
#41
Well you really have nothing to worry about then, Dx3. Just park the cars you care about the most in the garage. Duh!
Interesting, that cats must be on a leash where you live. However, the majority of cities/counties, to my knowledge, have no such ordinance (including mine).
Your homeowners insurance covers financial penalties associated with criminal and tort law offenses? Wow, that must be fantastic policy. I'll have to look into one of those. Then I can act any way I want with fiscal impunity. Sweet!
Sicking your dogs on a cat, shooting a cat with a .22 for simply being on your property? That is, by almost any standard, incompatible with the level of civility required to function successfully in modern American society and is clearly an irrational and psychotic act. Even if you kill one cat, there are probably more to take it's place. It's a futile and battle.
What if a little kid, (who has more intelligence than a cat, and therefore should know to stay off your property) that should lawfully be under the watch of a supervisory individual, were roaming around on/ unintentionally damaging your property? Would you sick your dogs on or shoot him/her? According to your argument, that would be permissible.
PS: Smaller animals being killed by larger animals is "natures workings?" Lol, ok. Humans are obviously animals (simply more intelligent and therefore more prolific than many other animals). Can a fat man go around killing skinny people? Can we let the lions and tigers out of the zoo? After all, it’s just "natures workings," and it’s A-ok.
Interesting, that cats must be on a leash where you live. However, the majority of cities/counties, to my knowledge, have no such ordinance (including mine).
Your homeowners insurance covers financial penalties associated with criminal and tort law offenses? Wow, that must be fantastic policy. I'll have to look into one of those. Then I can act any way I want with fiscal impunity. Sweet!
Sicking your dogs on a cat, shooting a cat with a .22 for simply being on your property? That is, by almost any standard, incompatible with the level of civility required to function successfully in modern American society and is clearly an irrational and psychotic act. Even if you kill one cat, there are probably more to take it's place. It's a futile and battle.
What if a little kid, (who has more intelligence than a cat, and therefore should know to stay off your property) that should lawfully be under the watch of a supervisory individual, were roaming around on/ unintentionally damaging your property? Would you sick your dogs on or shoot him/her? According to your argument, that would be permissible.
PS: Smaller animals being killed by larger animals is "natures workings?" Lol, ok. Humans are obviously animals (simply more intelligent and therefore more prolific than many other animals). Can a fat man go around killing skinny people? Can we let the lions and tigers out of the zoo? After all, it’s just "natures workings," and it’s A-ok.
10-29-07 | 03:42 PM
#42
Edit - for the sake of this thread I will delete my post. However, I was curious as to why my post infuriated you when people were talking about killing, shooting, poisoning cats - all I said was I would set my dog on them.
I would be more than willing to continue this debate via PM if you choose.
Have a nice day :-)
Jonny
I would be more than willing to continue this debate via PM if you choose.
Have a nice day :-)
Jonny
Last edited by Dx3; 10-29-07 at 03:48 PM.
10-29-07 | 05:21 PM
#43
Driver
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: CA
Man, I was looking at the scratches with the thought of fingernails to chalkboard ...just brutal................this thread has turned into 2 men arguing about p@$$y ...............(cat) that is!
Last edited by SupLex3; 10-29-07 at 05:24 PM.
10-29-07 | 05:56 PM
#44
And yes, enough with the cat argument. Bottom line--As a pet owner, you are responsible for the damage it does to other people's property. No matter the species.
Also, the owner of our house (we're renting a 3 year old house) was stupid enough to build a CARPORT instead of a garage, so I have no protection. I supposed I could get a car cover, though...
10-29-07 | 09:32 PM
#45
Lead Lap
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: CA
Are all you guys kids or what? The damage has been done, all he needs to do is fix it.
You don't need to go into Killing cats, dogs are better, etc, etc
seriously what the F@cK?
It's not even that big of a deal, just polish it out, (Use Scratch X)
You don't need to go into Killing cats, dogs are better, etc, etc
seriously what the F@cK?
It's not even that big of a deal, just polish it out, (Use Scratch X)