SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Should I?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-09, 11:58 AM
  #1  
986ci's
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
986ci's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Should I?

I have a 1992 SC300, I looked at a 1992 SC400, all maintaince records and services are complete on both cars, but the SC400 is by far an over nicer condition car. SO my question is there are alot of 300's here but I don't see to many 400's and definatly not moded like I've seen. So pro's / cons over making the switch? Or a basic yes or no with a good reason.
btw mileage is 116k on mine and mileage on the 400 is 108k
Old 06-09-09, 12:19 PM
  #2  
Hil
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (61)
 
Hil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UCLA
Posts: 7,046
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would switch em. Just because the SC400 sounds nicer. Plus it's just me but I wouldn't really think about boosting so I wouldn't prefer an SC300 in that case. Straight off the bat the SC4 would be quicker. Gas mileage might be a bit worse on the SC4. There is plenty of info on the forums showing the differences between the two. Just look em up and hopefully it will help your decision
Old 06-09-09, 12:20 PM
  #3  
Jay-Balrog
Driver
 
Jay-Balrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: fl
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

300 is easier to mod. twin turbo engine is a direct swap which it isnt in the 400 (needs different motor mounts if im not mistaken)

even if you stay stock pretty much everything is made for the 2jz cus of our cooler, more popular cousin with the same motor. the 1uz. not so much.


if you just want a cruiser, dont plan on doing much more to the motor then exhaust id get the 400 since its quicker from the factory.

if you plan on modding for speed. keep yours.
Old 06-09-09, 12:26 PM
  #4  
986ci's
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
986ci's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I have the Shelby for speed, my target was right around 400hp, so since the 4 is 385hp (if i'm not mistaken) i'm already pretty much at my target. Mainly want a nice RELIABLE quick car
Old 06-09-09, 12:31 PM
  #5  
Ryeno
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Ryeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NA
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not really worth it, if you want a 400 get a 98+ vvti model.
Old 06-09-09, 12:36 PM
  #6  
986ci's
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
986ci's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mainly wanting a cheap daily, this won't be a "project car" will put good suspension, wheels, tint, stereo and then leave it alone. So a 1998 as nice as it would be really isn't a cheap cash car like this one is.
Old 06-09-09, 12:37 PM
  #7  
Jewcano
No Sir, I Don't Like It

iTrader: (4)
 
Jewcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 8,754
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I was pulling 21-22mpg out of my SC400 when I had it. That is with conservative driving. If you aren't going to mod it, pick that up, if you plan to mod, the 300 would be the easier choice.
Old 06-09-09, 12:44 PM
  #8  
986ci's
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
986ci's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jewcano
I was pulling 21-22mpg out of my SC400 when I had it. That is with conservative driving. If you aren't going to mod it, pick that up, if you plan to mod, the 300 would be the easier choice.
Only mods, wheels, tint, stereo and suspension
Old 06-09-09, 12:53 PM
  #9  
djb5118
Lead Lap
 
djb5118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 986ci's
Well I have the Shelby for speed, my target was right around 400hp, so since the 4 is 385hp (if i'm not mistaken) i'm already pretty much at my target. Mainly want a nice RELIABLE quick car
not sure where you found that number, but a 1992 sc400 does not have 385hp
Old 06-09-09, 12:55 PM
  #10  
986ci's
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
986ci's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djb5118
not sure where you found that number, but a 1992 sc400 does not have 385hp
what is the power then
Old 06-09-09, 12:55 PM
  #11  
986ci's
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
986ci's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djb5118
not sure where you found that number, but a 1992 sc400 does not have 385hp
what is the power then
and was I right the Sc300 makes 190hp?
Old 06-09-09, 12:57 PM
  #12  
Jay-Balrog
Driver
 
Jay-Balrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: fl
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sc300 about 220. sc4 about 280.
Old 06-09-09, 01:01 PM
  #13  
6SOARER
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (20)
 
6SOARER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

around 250 for the first gen 400's then the later years produced 250-290 with the VVT-i


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexus_SC
Old 06-09-09, 01:06 PM
  #14  
Jewcano
No Sir, I Don't Like It

iTrader: (4)
 
Jewcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 8,754
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay-Balrog
sc300 about 220. sc4 about 280.
Depends on the year, and Lexus was VERY generous with their ratings. They rated the 92 SC400 with 250 to the crank, which was around 200-225 to the wheels. With higher mileage, you can expect under 200.
Old 06-09-09, 01:18 PM
  #15  
djb5118
Lead Lap
 
djb5118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

plus, the sc400 isn't really much faster than the sc300 in those generations. it is a bit heavier which hurts its 0-60 time if i remember correctly


Quick Reply: Should I?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 AM.