Sc300 vs 400
08-15-09, 08:24 AM
#16
Driver
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems more logical to buy a Supra rather than get a SC3 to mimic one. Think of the segment this car was designed for; there is a lot of engineering in there to achieve the lux coupe cruiser. An aluminum V8, not meant to be modded, was the top model designation that evolved into the SC430. Get a 4 if you really love the factory design presentation intended for the U.S. market. Otherwise, get a Supra over a SC3 because it is a much better performance equipped starting point for those who wish to be Fast and the Furious. Just 2 cents from the other side of the spectrum. [SC400; 1992 Motortrend import car of the year] 
Lexus Proliferation
Lexus Proliferation
08-15-09, 09:28 AM
#17
In regards to which chassis to choose I do agree with you. The only issue is the cost difference between the 2 chassis'. I'm sure most people (including myself) who choose to set up their SC's with various racing setups would rather have a Supra, but the price of the Supra is ridiculous. Essentially, with the SC you get the same car. Stock for stock the supra is handles better and is better suited for the track. Alternatively, after suspension and power upgrades there isn't much that separates them in terms of level of performance. Therefore, the SC is just a better deal. Don't get me wrong, the SC has good looks and sex appeal as well
08-15-09, 07:11 PM
#18
Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Uranus
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In regards to which chassis to choose I do agree with you. The only issue is the cost difference between the 2 chassis'. I'm sure most people (including myself) who choose to set up their SC's with various racing setups would rather have a Supra, but the price of the Supra is ridiculous. Essentially, with the SC you get the same car. Stock for stock the supra is handles better and is better suited for the track. Alternatively, after suspension and power upgrades there isn't much that separates them in terms of level of performance. Therefore, the SC is just a better deal. Don't get me wrong, the SC has good looks and sex appeal as well
08-15-09, 07:17 PM
#19
sc400 all the way . i got one and love it way better then sc300. rember this when u think alot of peopl here have sc 300 not much people have the 400 thimk bout . these things are beast . when u play with them
08-15-09, 09:09 PM
#20
Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Uranus
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the 0.1 sec 0-60 and 0.2 sec in the quarter the 400 lb lighter SC3 5 spd manual trails behind the SC400 auto.
"ACCELERATION
Year, Model, & Drivetrain 0 - 60 mph Quarter mile
1992 SC300 4-speed auto 7.2 sec 15.8 sec at 89 mph
1992 SC300 5-speed manual 6.8 sec 15.4 sec at 90 mph
1995 SC400 4-speed auto 6.7 sec 15.2 sec at 93 mph
1998 SC400 5-speed auto 6.3 sec 14.7 sec at 97 mph"
Luckily, all mentioned iterations of the Soarer are great vehicles.
Last edited by Rex Ruthor; 08-15-09 at 09:11 PM. Reason: spelling check gone wild
08-15-09, 10:08 PM
#21
And the 0.1 sec 0-60 and 0.2 sec in the quarter the 400 lb lighter SC3 5 spd manual trails behind the SC400 auto.
"ACCELERATION
Year, Model, & Drivetrain 0 - 60 mph Quarter mile
1992 SC300 4-speed auto 7.2 sec 15.8 sec at 89 mph
1992 SC300 5-speed manual 6.8 sec 15.4 sec at 90 mph
1995 SC400 4-speed auto 6.7 sec 15.2 sec at 93 mph
1998 SC400 5-speed auto 6.3 sec 14.7 sec at 97 mph"
Luckily, all mentioned iterations of the Soarer are great vehicles.
"ACCELERATION
Year, Model, & Drivetrain 0 - 60 mph Quarter mile
1992 SC300 4-speed auto 7.2 sec 15.8 sec at 89 mph
1992 SC300 5-speed manual 6.8 sec 15.4 sec at 90 mph
1995 SC400 4-speed auto 6.7 sec 15.2 sec at 93 mph
1998 SC400 5-speed auto 6.3 sec 14.7 sec at 97 mph"
Luckily, all mentioned iterations of the Soarer are great vehicles.
08-15-09, 10:33 PM
#22
Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Uranus
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-15-09, 11:37 PM
#24
Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Uranus
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
, I posted the question and then read the rest of the post and saw the answer...my bad.
08-16-09, 08:50 AM
#30
Driver
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With that in mind, I guess it depends on what you want to build.
Since the SC400 weighs 10% more than a Supra, if you just care about acceleration and not handling, dollar for dollar, can one build a V8 to make 10% more power than a built I6?
Since the SC400 weighs 10% more than a Supra, if you just care about acceleration and not handling, dollar for dollar, can one build a V8 to make 10% more power than a built I6?