SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)

sc300 with a lexus 5.0l is-f motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-10, 07:56 PM
  #76  
sc11190
Driver School Candidate
 
sc11190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: new york
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vadim540i
The only advantage of LSx is it's size and cheapness. That's all. It doesn't even have variable timing etc. Old school crap. Just think about it, if LSx had higher compression, better flowing head, DOHC vvti, etc, it would have close to 65efficient as civic ex engine.
OLD School crap?
sc11190 is offline  
Old 10-03-10, 08:05 PM
  #77  
brsauto
Pole Position
 
brsauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vadim540i
The only advantage of LSx is it's size and cheapness. That's all. It doesn't even have variable timing etc. Old school crap. Just think about it, if LSx had higher compression, better flowing head, DOHC vvti, etc, it would have close to 650hp without supercharger from 7L. The engine efficiency is ~71hp/liter, which makes it as efficient as civic ex engine.


hahaha i can promise you noone on any domestic forum is talking about putting a toyota motor V8 in their hot rods , they do however talk about putting a 2j's in them cuz we all know that the 2jz is the big block of the import world .

and as far as variable valve timing... its sucks IMO
brsauto is offline  
Old 10-03-10, 10:43 PM
  #78  
Klaus
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Klaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vadim540i
The only advantage of LSx is it's size and cheapness. That's all. It doesn't even have variable timing etc. Old school crap. Just think about it, if LSx had higher compression, better flowing head, DOHC vvti, etc, it would have close to 650hp without supercharger from 7L. The engine efficiency is ~71hp/liter, which makes it as efficient as civic ex engine.
Don't agree with you here on the lack of LS advantages. Now I am SPECIFICALLY referencing the LS2. There were big improvements from the LS1.

The LS2 is extremely efficient for it's power. Find me a 400hp v8 that can get 28MPG on the highway, and 23 combined city/hwy.

Technology wise, it has displacement on demand which I would much rather have than variable valve timing which I feel is an overly complex technology with minimal benefit. So still with all of this "old technology" GM has managed to make an engine that not only overtakes toyota's halo V8 (IS-F engine) in performance, but ALSO significantly wins on efficiency. To beat toyota at their own game of efficiency while making power? Impressive

400hp out of the box, with plenty of room to spare for inexpensive, proven, and readily available horsepower. This not only applies to performance parts, but basic maintenance parts are also super easy to get ahold of and are quite affordable.

Excellent knowledge available- if you have a problem, you WILL find the answer.

Good value- the 1uz is actually a super cheap v8- $400-500 for a 260 hp engine isn't too bad. But $3500 for a reliable and efficient 400hp v8 is a good value, but not something I would consider "cheap".

Easily mate a t56 6 speed manual, a 4l80e 4 speed automatic, or a 6l80e 6 speed automatic- nice transmission options.


At the end of the day if you are planning on building a DRIVER'S car- a car that is daily drivable, make a good amount of horsepower, and is easy/reasonable to maintain, the ls2 is a great choice vs nearly any other v8 available. Again, we can speculate all day about which motor is technically the most advanced, or the most race worthy, etc. but this is about those of us who want to actually enjoy driving the cars we own rather than just building them

Last edited by Klaus; 10-03-10 at 10:49 PM.
Klaus is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 01:57 AM
  #79  
2turbo1sup
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
2turbo1sup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vadim540i
The only advantage of LSx is it's size and cheapness. That's all. It doesn't even have variable timing etc. Old school crap. Just think about it, if LSx had higher compression, better flowing head, DOHC vvti, etc, it would have close to 650hp without supercharger from 7L. The engine efficiency is ~71hp/liter, which makes it as efficient as civic ex engine.
Hahahahha!

there you go guys, VVTi or VTEK! is the pinnacle of human engineering and its the benchmark of excellence in engine building and performance

This one takes the cake for pure ignorance and bias all wrapped up in one of the best automotive quotes i've ever read in an automotive forum

"Your car may be faster than mine, but MY engine is more efficient than yours! *shakes fist!*"

Last edited by 2turbo1sup; 10-04-10 at 02:01 AM.
2turbo1sup is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 02:43 AM
  #80  
millertime
Pole Position
 
millertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Putting an LQ4 with LS6 intake and LS1 pan in my SC300,

aka Iron Block LS2
millertime is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 04:29 AM
  #81  
dandd2
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
dandd2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: tx
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brsauto
hahaha i can promise you noone on any domestic forum is talking about putting a toyota motor V8 in their hot rods , they do however talk about putting a 2j's in them cuz we all know that the 2jz is the big block of the import world .

and as far as variable valve timing... its sucks IMO
67 camaro, 2jz swap 1000 hp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZqtJTlXON8
dandd2 is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 07:00 AM
  #82  
Klaus
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Klaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by millertime
Putting an LQ4 with LS6 intake and LS1 pan in my SC300,

aka Iron Block LS2
http://www.carcraft.com/projectbuild...ock/index.html

480hp for under $4000. You putting up a build thread? Very interested to see this
Klaus is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 12:17 PM
  #83  
Vadim540i
Lexus Test Driver
 
Vadim540i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 906
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2turbo1sup
Hahahahha!

there you go guys, VVTi or VTEK! is the pinnacle of human engineering and its the benchmark of excellence in engine building and performance

This one takes the cake for pure ignorance and bias all wrapped up in one of the best automotive quotes i've ever read in an automotive forum

"Your car may be faster than mine, but MY engine is more efficient than yours! *shakes fist!*"
When will people understand that faster doesn't mean better...
Vadim540i is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 12:24 PM
  #84  
Exthultu
Pole Position
iTrader: (3)
 
Exthultu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

VVTI added +1 hp to the 2jz.
Exthultu is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 12:43 PM
  #85  
Klaus
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Klaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vadim540i
When will people understand that faster doesn't mean better...
Fair enough, however extra technology does not always equal better as well. Alright, you're in the debate I'll listen- what benefits does the IS-F 2UR-GSE engine offer vs the LS2? Furthermore, once you've evaluated it versus the LS2, could you make the same comparison vs the LS3 which is in a similar although still slightly lower price range? I am by no means a GM fan boy- 95% of the reason I bought my MKIV was because of the 2jz-gte and 6 speed which is in my opinion one of the best made factory street car motors of all time. I just can't find logical justification as to why I would select a 2UR over an LS. Seemingly the only justification provided so far is a "cool factor" which at the end of the day... who cares?
Klaus is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 01:10 PM
  #86  
RedPhoenix
Lexus Fanatic

iTrader: (10)
 
RedPhoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Im swapping a 4age into my SC and no one can stop me!
RedPhoenix is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 02:49 PM
  #87  
JakeBreyck
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
JakeBreyck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fl
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exthultu
VVTI added +1 hp to the 2jz.
At peak or across the power band? across the power band ok lame, but if it was 1hp at peak and say 40hp at 3krpm that's nice.
JakeBreyck is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 04:48 PM
  #88  
Vadim540i
Lexus Test Driver
 
Vadim540i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 906
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exthultu
VVTI added +1 hp to the 2jz.
Oddly enough it added 40hp and 30tq on 1UZ. And not only peak, it also moved the power band much lower. 80% of tq available at 2k rpm - while non vvti UZ only wakes up up top. Look, I'm not praising VVti or vtec or whatever here, I'm just saying that technologically, most american V8s (except for new mustang 5.0, that is pretty nice) are still in the 80s. And what about transmissions? I'm not even gonna touch that...
Vadim540i is offline  
Old 10-04-10, 05:01 PM
  #89  
Vadim540i
Lexus Test Driver
 
Vadim540i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 906
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaus
Fair enough, however extra technology does not always equal better as well. Alright, you're in the debate I'll listen- what benefits does the IS-F 2UR-GSE engine offer vs the LS2? Furthermore, once you've evaluated it versus the LS2, could you make the same comparison vs the LS3 which is in a similar although still slightly lower price range? I am by no means a GM fan boy- 95% of the reason I bought my MKIV was because of the 2jz-gte and 6 speed which is in my opinion one of the best made factory street car motors of all time. I just can't find logical justification as to why I would select a 2UR over an LS. Seemingly the only justification provided so far is a "cool factor" which at the end of the day... who cares?
I agree, for a swap it has no sense at all to take 2UR (well maybe just for the sake of uniqueness). I was mostly arguing about the whole old vs new technology in new cars. Food for thought - if american automakers would be competitive, they would not go bankrupt (just pure logic). And use of LSx series of engines is not because they are so great but because they simply can't afford to developed an engine from scratch... but then again, if the current engine is sufficient enough (and average consumer doesn't care if it's 60s technology), why waste money? Another interesting thing, let me guess why you chose Supra instead of let's say corvette. While corvette has a good engine, and alright handling it lacks the quality of supra, starting from the interior, to the quality of paint and bodywork. So again, having supersize engine doesn't mean that the car is great.
Vadim540i is offline  
Old 10-05-10, 10:12 AM
  #90  
Klaus
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Klaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vadim540i
I agree, for a swap it has no sense at all to take 2UR (well maybe just for the sake of uniqueness). I was mostly arguing about the whole old vs new technology in new cars. Food for thought - if american automakers would be competitive, they would not go bankrupt (just pure logic). And use of LSx series of engines is not because they are so great but because they simply can't afford to developed an engine from scratch... but then again, if the current engine is sufficient enough (and average consumer doesn't care if it's 60s technology), why waste money? Another interesting thing, let me guess why you chose Supra instead of let's say corvette. While corvette has a good engine, and alright handling it lacks the quality of supra, starting from the interior, to the quality of paint and bodywork. So again, having supersize engine doesn't mean that the car is great.
You make an excellent point here about American automakers, and the corvette as well- both related points. The weakness of the american cars hasn't really been their engines. Overall they are built very well and have had significantly less problems (northstar excluded... haha) than their german counterparts and I would say they are currently on par reliability wise with japanese engines. HOWEVER for some damn reason they can't do anything else right. Interiors- terrible, looks- debatable with a few notable exceptions, built quality- bad and getting worse. So yes, the corvette lacks in nearly every way versus the supra and it is reflected in it's long term depreciation (C5s can now be had for $13k...) however the engine is not the weak link

But of course the debate in this thread is purely comparing the apples to apples of two high performance motors. An engine should be evaluated on 4 major points - Efficiency, Reliability, Power, Cost/Ease of maintenance. The technology in the engine is not a result, but rather the technology is there to support those four factors. An efficient, reliable, powerful, and cost effective engine is the desire of all drivers and the LS2 IMO is the best V8 in this category even with older technology, which in reality just makes the feat that much more impressive.
Klaus is offline  


Quick Reply: sc300 with a lexus 5.0l is-f motor



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:16 AM.