Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
#1
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
This is the Dyno-test result from my 96 SC300. Mod are: (Automatic fan kit, K&N Air Filter + a little trick to the air mass sensor and Breather. Total $223.00 dollars = 248hp). I also had ZEX nitrous installed with 50hp spray nozzle. The result including my cheap mod adds up to 262hp which make me unhappy (maybe something wrong with my installation). I erase the result from the 50hp shoot from the sheet and sold the kit for my friend today.
Sorry I remove the pic due to many disadvatages. I will post a new one next week with my new mod ideas.
Thank You
Sorry I remove the pic due to many disadvatages. I will post a new one next week with my new mod ideas.
Thank You
Last edited by henrynguyen; 09-17-02 at 07:04 PM.
#2
Chicago Lexus Club Moderator
Re: Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
Originally posted by henrynguyen
This is the Dyno-test result from my 96 SC300. Mod are: (Automatic fan kit, K&N Air Filter + a little trick to the air mass sensor and Breather. Total $223.00 dollars = 248hp). I also had ZEX nitrous installed with 50hp spray nozzle. The result including my cheap mod adds up to 262hp which make me unhappy (maybe something wrong with my installation). I erase the result from the 50hp shoot from the sheet and sold the kit for my friend today.
This is the Dyno-test result from my 96 SC300. Mod are: (Automatic fan kit, K&N Air Filter + a little trick to the air mass sensor and Breather. Total $223.00 dollars = 248hp). I also had ZEX nitrous installed with 50hp spray nozzle. The result including my cheap mod adds up to 262hp which make me unhappy (maybe something wrong with my installation). I erase the result from the 50hp shoot from the sheet and sold the kit for my friend today.
Last edited by DIrEctQL; 09-15-02 at 09:07 PM.
#3
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Re: Re: Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
Originally posted by DIrEctQL
I noticed a line was erased from the graph. That line looks like a torque line. Horsepower and torque should cross at around 5250 rpm. Something is wrong with this dyno.
I noticed a line was erased from the graph. That line looks like a torque line. Horsepower and torque should cross at around 5250 rpm. Something is wrong with this dyno.
what is the automatic fan kit? and how does it free up power?
and what little trick did you do with the MAF?
oh and the motor can handle hella more than 50hp shot
Last edited by Bean; 09-15-02 at 09:53 PM.
#4
Chicago Lexus Club Moderator
Re: Re: Re: Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
Originally posted by Bean
no, thats only when the torque and horsepower use the same scale on their readings, which they don't in this case
what is the automatic fan kit? and how does it free up power?
and what little trick did you do with the MAF?
oh and the motor can handle hella more than 50hp shot
no, thats only when the torque and horsepower use the same scale on their readings, which they don't in this case
what is the automatic fan kit? and how does it free up power?
and what little trick did you do with the MAF?
oh and the motor can handle hella more than 50hp shot
As far as the mods, he probably has electric fans and raised the signal from the MAF (same as AFC, but more risky).
#5
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
Originally posted by Bean
no, thats only when the torque and horsepower use the same scale on their readings, which they don't in this case
what is the automatic fan kit? and how does it free up power?
and what little trick did you do with the MAF?
oh and the motor can handle hella more than 50hp shot
no, thats only when the torque and horsepower use the same scale on their readings, which they don't in this case
what is the automatic fan kit? and how does it free up power?
and what little trick did you do with the MAF?
oh and the motor can handle hella more than 50hp shot
The erase line wasn't the torgue line. I was the 50hp shoot of NOS. When NOS kicked in, my engine function improperly because of NOS kit wasn’t installed correctly. If leave that line, your guys will think my mod is crazy gain of hp at low RPM but add up to wrong hp. Without NOS 248hp, with NOS 248+50NOS= 298hp but I only have 262. I have a different kit on order. I will try it again to see if it work.
AFM Trick:
I bypass the AFM air measure for air/fuel mixture by adding additional air filter after the AFM. At full throttle, NOS kick in and give me 262hp at around 2.5-5.0RPM and dropped quickly after that. The trick on AFM gives me additional HP like the way NOS work but it is not very safe for daily driven car.
Automatic Fan Kit:
Replace your clutch fan with automatic fan kit 16” will give you additional hp and save gas. The clutch fan take away between 10-15hp from your engine. The automatic fan kits are very popular, so you can purchase the kit from most performance shops or even at auto part stores.
#6
Forum Administrator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
Originally posted by henrynguyen
Without NOS 248hp, with NOS 248+50NOS= 298hp but I only have 262. .
Without NOS 248hp, with NOS 248+50NOS= 298hp but I only have 262. .
So when a nitrous company advertises a '50 shot' like you've got, are they talking about 50 rear wheel horsepower or 50 at the crank? I'd always assume it was HP at the crank... I'm assuming you're doing a rear wheel dyno?
If you're getting 248 RWHP on an SC300 NA with minor mods, that sounds pretty damn good to me! I've only had a couple of runs better than that in my GS4, 248 rwhp is right what my average is (so far ) w 306 tq.
#7
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
Originally posted by DaveGS4
Henry (or whomever may know this):
So when a nitrous company advertises a '50 shot' like you've got, are they talking about 50 rear wheel horsepower or 50 at the crank? I'd always assume it was HP at the crank... I'm assuming you're doing a rear wheel dyno?
If you're getting 248 RWHP on an SC300 NA with minor mods, that sounds pretty damn good to me! I've only had a couple of runs better than that in my GS4, 248 rwhp is right what my average is (so far ) w 306 tq.
Henry (or whomever may know this):
So when a nitrous company advertises a '50 shot' like you've got, are they talking about 50 rear wheel horsepower or 50 at the crank? I'd always assume it was HP at the crank... I'm assuming you're doing a rear wheel dyno?
If you're getting 248 RWHP on an SC300 NA with minor mods, that sounds pretty damn good to me! I've only had a couple of runs better than that in my GS4, 248 rwhp is right what my average is (so far ) w 306 tq.
Trending Topics
#8
Forum Administrator
iTrader: (2)
Thanks for the quick reply/confirmation Henry. So the dynos you are doing on your engine are at the crank on your SC?
mmmm 100 shot
mmmm 100 shot
#9
Chicago Lexus Club Moderator
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dyno Test Result From Cheap Mods
Originally posted by henrynguyen
No no no not at the wheel. It is at the crank. I think I better but metal head gasket before trying to put 100shot in this coming week.
No no no not at the wheel. It is at the crank. I think I better but metal head gasket before trying to put 100shot in this coming week.
#10
Air Flow Trick
Henry, can you explain that air flow meter trick to me again? i didn't totally understand what you did and how i can do it on my 93 sc400. How does it improve hp? better flow or richer fuel on top end?
Thx, frank
Thx, frank
#11
'96 SC300
Henry
two questions
1) do you know what you're getting at the wheels?
I also have a '96 and with my mod's (see my sig) I only get 185 at the wheels. I've guestimated that I have 240-250 at the crank
2) have you tried driving around after tuning and then re-dynoing?
I've noticed when I put in the SAFC that the OBDII seems to "take away some of the gains" I've yet to really test this out by resetting the ECU and re-dynoing
By the way, where are you in Minnesota, I'm just outside of Minneapolis.
two questions
1) do you know what you're getting at the wheels?
I also have a '96 and with my mod's (see my sig) I only get 185 at the wheels. I've guestimated that I have 240-250 at the crank
2) have you tried driving around after tuning and then re-dynoing?
I've noticed when I put in the SAFC that the OBDII seems to "take away some of the gains" I've yet to really test this out by resetting the ECU and re-dynoing
By the way, where are you in Minnesota, I'm just outside of Minneapolis.
#12
Chicago Lexus Club Moderator
Re: '96 SC300
Originally posted by JKAG
Henry
two questions
1) do you know what you're getting at the wheels?
I also have a '96 and with my mod's (see my sig) I only get 185 at the wheels. I've guestimated that I have 240-250 at the crank
2) have you tried driving around after tuning and then re-dynoing?
I've noticed when I put in the SAFC that the OBDII seems to "take away some of the gains" I've yet to really test this out by resetting the ECU and re-dynoing
By the way, where are you in Minnesota, I'm just outside of Minneapolis.
Henry
two questions
1) do you know what you're getting at the wheels?
I also have a '96 and with my mod's (see my sig) I only get 185 at the wheels. I've guestimated that I have 240-250 at the crank
2) have you tried driving around after tuning and then re-dynoing?
I've noticed when I put in the SAFC that the OBDII seems to "take away some of the gains" I've yet to really test this out by resetting the ECU and re-dynoing
By the way, where are you in Minnesota, I'm just outside of Minneapolis.
#13
Timing
DIrEctQL
So you're saying that when I added the SAFC the OBDII retard cancelled out the timing adjusment made by the G-force chip.
That fits since I made 185 with G-force alone and 185 with G-force and SAFC.
God! I love my car but I wish I had known to get a '95
So you're saying that when I added the SAFC the OBDII retard cancelled out the timing adjusment made by the G-force chip.
That fits since I made 185 with G-force alone and 185 with G-force and SAFC.
God! I love my car but I wish I had known to get a '95
#14
Chicago Lexus Club Moderator
Re: Timing
Originally posted by JKAG
DIrEctQL
So you're saying that when I added the SAFC the OBDII retard cancelled out the timing adjusment made by the G-force chip.
That fits since I made 185 with G-force alone and 185 with G-force and SAFC.
God! I love my car but I wish I had known to get a '95
DIrEctQL
So you're saying that when I added the SAFC the OBDII retard cancelled out the timing adjusment made by the G-force chip.
That fits since I made 185 with G-force alone and 185 with G-force and SAFC.
God! I love my car but I wish I had known to get a '95
Chris
#15
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Air Flow Trick
Originally posted by Frankinaustin
Henry, can you explain that air flow meter trick to me again? i didn't totally understand what you did and how i can do it on my 93 sc400. How does it improve hp? better flow or richer fuel on top end?
Thx, frank
Henry, can you explain that air flow meter trick to me again? i didn't totally understand what you did and how i can do it on my 93 sc400. How does it improve hp? better flow or richer fuel on top end?
Thx, frank