Thoughts on the 2005 MB SLK
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Having just bought a Pebble Beach 430, which I adore (after a miserable experience with a new 2003.5 M3 convertible), I have to admit browsing the web for more information on the new MB SLK coming out later this year. Like the SC, it has the wonderful retractable hard top (I will NEVER again own a soft top convertible), new improved looks borrowed from the McClaren SLR, and an AMG V8 version with 350 horses (yikes). Anyway, not to be disloyal, because as I said before, I could not be happier with my SC, is there anyone else out there with wandering eyes?
Oh and BTW, anyone have any idea why I can't add to message threads, but I can post new ones?
Cheers,
Glenn
Oh and BTW, anyone have any idea why I can't add to message threads, but I can post new ones?
Cheers,
Glenn
#3
Pole Position
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i dunno, im not feeling the front end of the new slk. it has that kid brother look =P. on the other hand, the MB SL500, 600,55 are gorgeous. by adding new messages do you mean replying? (if so, the bottom right corner has a post reply button)
#4
Super Moderator
![](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/ranks/rank-smod2.gif)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
new improved looks borrowed from the McClaren SLR
Last edited by Gojirra99; 04-20-04 at 05:37 PM.
#5
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I also think MB messed up the SLK big time. By the way, I also hate the McLaren, which is similar. The SL is much better looking than both, but not worth 30 grand more to me. I certainly woudn't mind having one; saw an SL65 AMG the other day, and it's gorgeous. the guy took off like a madman. It's got to be WAY faster than our cars; it was a speck in the horizon in no time.
As far as the SLK350, as ugly as it is (IMO, of course), it should outperform the SC in every respect, and at significant savings I'm sure, but it's much smaller as well. No way I'd own one, and neither a boxster, S2000, or any of those miniature roadsters. It seems like you can reach the trunk lid by extending your arm backwards (yuk!).
Finally, just as Glenn said, I'll NEVER own a ragtop again. Not to worry; have you seen the myriad of cars coming out with hardtops lately? The most interesting one is the upcoming VW cabriotet; it has a glass roof, and you can either partially open it like a targa, or completely like our cars. All in a very good looking package. That's an engineering achievement. There's another small car coming out with a hardtop as well. So much for an 'exclusive' feature, huh?
Good evening.
As far as the SLK350, as ugly as it is (IMO, of course), it should outperform the SC in every respect, and at significant savings I'm sure, but it's much smaller as well. No way I'd own one, and neither a boxster, S2000, or any of those miniature roadsters. It seems like you can reach the trunk lid by extending your arm backwards (yuk!).
Finally, just as Glenn said, I'll NEVER own a ragtop again. Not to worry; have you seen the myriad of cars coming out with hardtops lately? The most interesting one is the upcoming VW cabriotet; it has a glass roof, and you can either partially open it like a targa, or completely like our cars. All in a very good looking package. That's an engineering achievement. There's another small car coming out with a hardtop as well. So much for an 'exclusive' feature, huh?
Good evening.
#6
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Re: PB430
I also have the new and rare (only 400 in USA) "Pebble Beach Edition" SC430. It's my dream car. They can keep the unreliable and commonplace Mercedes-Benz SLK, even the more expensive SL 500. If I had a new SL 500, I'd sell it in favor of a Pebble Beach and pocket the $20-25 grand difference.
I'm still amazed at the admiring, often furtive glances of M-B and XLR owners on Chicago's Rush Street (night life). I have yet to see another "Pebble Beach Edition" outside of a Lexus showroom last fall. It was sold to a Floridian within hours.
I declined the run-flats in favor of Michelin Pilot Sport A/S with spare kit added. I knew from the git-go that storage space is virtually non-existent.
I had to pay full MSRP "sticker" price ($65,335) plus tax. What did YOU pay, Glenn?
I also have the new and rare (only 400 in USA) "Pebble Beach Edition" SC430. It's my dream car. They can keep the unreliable and commonplace Mercedes-Benz SLK, even the more expensive SL 500. If I had a new SL 500, I'd sell it in favor of a Pebble Beach and pocket the $20-25 grand difference.
I'm still amazed at the admiring, often furtive glances of M-B and XLR owners on Chicago's Rush Street (night life). I have yet to see another "Pebble Beach Edition" outside of a Lexus showroom last fall. It was sold to a Floridian within hours.
I declined the run-flats in favor of Michelin Pilot Sport A/S with spare kit added. I knew from the git-go that storage space is virtually non-existent.
I had to pay full MSRP "sticker" price ($65,335) plus tax. What did YOU pay, Glenn?
#7
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by anonymous
I'd take the SLK in a heartbeat. You can get a very well equipped SLK 350 for probably less than the SC. The new interior is just outstanding in it.
I'd take the SLK in a heartbeat. You can get a very well equipped SLK 350 for probably less than the SC. The new interior is just outstanding in it.
Trending Topics
#9
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by mmarshall
This is an issue that has also been addessed in some of the other threads here. The SLK-SC comparison is skewed by the fact that Lexus could have done a new SC300 that would have competed with the SLK price-wise but didn't....they dropped the old model asnd didn't replace it. So basically a 40-45K SLK competes with a 61K SC430.
This is an issue that has also been addessed in some of the other threads here. The SLK-SC comparison is skewed by the fact that Lexus could have done a new SC300 that would have competed with the SLK price-wise but didn't....they dropped the old model asnd didn't replace it. So basically a 40-45K SLK competes with a 61K SC430.
As far as an SC300? Just doesn't make sense IMO, and I'm glad Lexus thinks the same way. The previous SC300 was several hundred pounds lighter, and much cheaper to build. My guess is Lexus will revert back to the 300/430 coupe forumla for the next iteration, but we'll see.
#10
Super Moderator
![](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/ranks/rank-smod2.gif)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by ELP_JC
. My guess is Lexus will revert back to the 300/430 coupe forumla for the next iteration, but we'll see.
. My guess is Lexus will revert back to the 300/430 coupe forumla for the next iteration, but we'll see.
. . .and I agree, SC330
![No No No](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/nono.gif)
Last edited by Gojirra99; 04-21-04 at 09:57 AM.
#11
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by ELP_JC
The SLK is not really a competitor to the SC, other than both have a retractable hardtop; it's a much smaller car. That's why an SLK350 can spank an SC (and an SL500). I'd never own such a small car, regardless of power and price. If somebody doesn't mind the size, it's obviously an attractive alternative to the SC, just like the SC is against the SL500 (both separated around $25K up and down).
As far as an SC300? Just doesn't make sense IMO, and I'm glad Lexus thinks the same way. The previous SC300 was several hundred pounds lighter, and much cheaper to build. My guess is Lexus will revert back to the 300/430 coupe forumla for the next iteration, but we'll see.
The SLK is not really a competitor to the SC, other than both have a retractable hardtop; it's a much smaller car. That's why an SLK350 can spank an SC (and an SL500). I'd never own such a small car, regardless of power and price. If somebody doesn't mind the size, it's obviously an attractive alternative to the SC, just like the SC is against the SL500 (both separated around $25K up and down).
As far as an SC300? Just doesn't make sense IMO, and I'm glad Lexus thinks the same way. The previous SC300 was several hundred pounds lighter, and much cheaper to build. My guess is Lexus will revert back to the 300/430 coupe forumla for the next iteration, but we'll see.
Well, any way, I would seriously consider an SC300/330 as a next car if Lexus would produce it, but I realize that not everyone in this forum agrees....and that is what these forums are for, to compare opinions.
#12
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Quality...quality...quality....
I will bet you that the new SLK is a paper tiger. That is, it may look good on the outside, but it's a POS on the inside. It will have a ton of quality issues...if they can't even get the G-wagon problem free (> 20 year old design), then SLK does not have a prayer! (BTW, i have been researching the G-wagon...so that's why i know.)
There's plenty of article out stating that Mercedes uses the cheapest parts available to bring the cost of their cars down.
Stick with your Lexus....
I will bet you that the new SLK is a paper tiger. That is, it may look good on the outside, but it's a POS on the inside. It will have a ton of quality issues...if they can't even get the G-wagon problem free (> 20 year old design), then SLK does not have a prayer! (BTW, i have been researching the G-wagon...so that's why i know.)
There's plenty of article out stating that Mercedes uses the cheapest parts available to bring the cost of their cars down.
Stick with your Lexus....
#13
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by tigmd99
Quality...quality...quality....
I will bet you that the new SLK is a paper tiger. That is, it may look good on the outside, but it's a POS on the inside. It will have a ton of quality issues...if they can't even get the G-wagon problem free (> 20 year old design), then SLK does not have a prayer! (BTW, i have been researching the G-wagon...so that's why i know.)
There's plenty of article out stating that Mercedes uses the cheapest parts available to bring the cost of their cars down.
Stick with your Lexus....
Quality...quality...quality....
I will bet you that the new SLK is a paper tiger. That is, it may look good on the outside, but it's a POS on the inside. It will have a ton of quality issues...if they can't even get the G-wagon problem free (> 20 year old design), then SLK does not have a prayer! (BTW, i have been researching the G-wagon...so that's why i know.)
There's plenty of article out stating that Mercedes uses the cheapest parts available to bring the cost of their cars down.
Stick with your Lexus....
![Frown](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
#14
Super Moderator
![](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/ranks/rank-smod2.gif)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by mmarshall
. . . . . .
Well, any way, I would seriously consider an SC300/330 as a next car if Lexus would produce it, but I realize that not everyone in this forum agrees....and that is what these forums are for, to compare opinions.
. . . . . .
Well, any way, I would seriously consider an SC300/330 as a next car if Lexus would produce it, but I realize that not everyone in this forum agrees....and that is what these forums are for, to compare opinions.