SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)

SC430 lowering /tire problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-05, 05:30 PM
  #16  
Memoryfab
Rookie
 
Memoryfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoubleWhoosh
This is true but the camber issue won't really change the limit of what size tire you can fit, the offset would just have to be adjusted accordingly. It may change things ever so slightly, but not a whole lot.

Anything 1 degree or less shouldnt' cause any noticeably accelerated tire wear issues. And once again, specifically with this chassis, I'm thinking the tire wear is not camber related, but more arm-play related. This is something I have believed in for probably the last 5 years but nobody seemed to hear or understand what I was saying.

As far as the SC430's, most are pretty new so they shouldn't have any really pending problems either way until they get some higher miles on them. The GS guys are really the guinea pigs and victims to a certain degree to see what the long term issues are with this chassis.
From any case when a customer wants to fit more agressive offset with wide tire without fender modifications and without rubbing it is much easier to fit them with a neg camber than without.

Pardon my assumptions, I assumed when people lower the SC430 it is more than 2 inches which usually neg to 1 degree or more camber. Your arm-play related issue is correct in respect that the adjustment of an upper arm will fix the camber. Other arms are used to keep tow and height play such as the ss kits available out there.

There is actually a big article on this in http://www.club-lexus.net one of the largest toyota sedan based community clubs in Japan.
Old 10-18-05, 05:47 PM
  #17  
DoubleWhoosh
Lexus Test Driver
 
DoubleWhoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: California
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Memoryfab
From any case when a customer wants to fit more agressive offset with wide tire without fender modifications and without rubbing it is much easier to fit them with a neg camber than without.

Pardon my assumptions, I assumed when people lower the SC430 it is more than 2 inches which usually neg to 1 degree or more camber. Your arm-play related issue is correct in respect that the adjustment of an upper arm will fix the camber. Other arms are used to keep tow and height play such as the ss kits available out there.

There is actually a big article on this in http://www.club-lexus.net one of the largest toyota sedan based community clubs in Japan.
Well, like I said, it minimally affects things, but your main center pivot point for upper tire clearance will be the lower ball joint, so not a huge difference is made to fit wheels. That point does not change, nor does its relative position to the fender lip. Yes, by moving the upper pivot point outward it changes things, as the arc radius increases, but still not a whole bunch as the upper arm is still shorter than the lower arm. For true help for fender clearance with more offset wheels, you would need to move the upper ball joint point UPWARD. This cannot be accomplished without some type of longer ball joint, modified spindle, etc. This would increase what is called camber gain. "Easier to fit" wheels as used in your context is somewhat of a misnomer in this case.

I don't think you understand what "arm-play" is referring to. It has absolutely nothing to do with fixing camber, caster, toe (or "tow" as you call it), but it refers to the play in the arms' mounting point themselves. Your arms will not fix this issue, and like I said before all this, I honestly don't see any camber more than 1 degree to be a horribly detrimental issue as far as tire wear. You do need negative camber for proper handling as well. Anything from -0.8 to -1 is good.

As far as lowering more than 2", with the proper diameter tires, this would not work, unless the tires were sitting pretty far inside the fender, it would be impossible to do this with agressive or flush-ish wheels. You would need tires that are smaller sized as far as diameter goes, and most SC430 owners would ultimately end up with taller tires (which is the case with the best looking or most popular tire/wheel combinations).
Old 10-18-05, 07:33 PM
  #18  
Memoryfab
Rookie
 
Memoryfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoubleWhoosh
I don't think you understand what "arm-play" is referring to. It has absolutely nothing to do with fixing camber, caster, toe (or "tow" as you call it), but it refers to the play in the arms' mounting point themselves. Your arms will not fix this issue, and like I said before all this, I honestly don't see any camber more than 1 degree to be a horribly detrimental issue as far as tire wear. You do need negative camber for proper handling as well. Anything from -0.8 to -1 is good.

As far as lowering more than 2", with the proper diameter tires, this would not work, unless the tires were sitting pretty far inside the fender, it would be impossible to do this with agressive or flush-ish wheels. You would need tires that are smaller sized as far as diameter goes, and most SC430 owners would ultimately end up with taller tires (which is the case with the best looking or most popular tire/wheel combinations).
Oh I am not disagreeing with you in anyway. I think there could be some miscommunication between us. I believe we come from different style of tuning. I am providing the solution used by most vipstyle cars in Japan. I must say that tire width size is not as important as dish or maximum wheel width. I tend to focus on cars with no visable gap between the tire and the fender.

Here is the original upper arm 60mm height joint.


The ss arm 30mm.


This lowers what the nihongjins call "height pitch" but not shock travel.
Before Install

After Install


When I talk about arm play was to refer to the upper bone arm which does affect camber on these toyota designs. This is why some companies like ikeya, c-one have キャンバーアジャスター・アッパーアーム, camber adjust upper arms for these toyota designs.

I do not know what knowledge confusions I may have or even if I am thinking about the same type of the tire wear the original poster is worried about, but I know that canceling abnormal tire wear due to lowering is accomplished easily with well designed products. If it did not work none of these suspension footwork companies would be in business and there is no way we would be able to sell these items in Japan.
Old 10-19-05, 12:04 AM
  #19  
DoubleWhoosh
Lexus Test Driver
 
DoubleWhoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: California
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Ok, I'm not sure if you understand fully what you are posting here, but you just showed something that relates to camber gain which is exactly what I was talking about above. Your shorter ball joint height there gives less camber gain, which means that the wheels will camber LESS as the suspension travels, which will give you LESS clearance to the fenders when the suspension starts to compress more. What you want is more camber gain so that the tire will tilt in more, and give more fender clearance.

The tire pictures of before and after are not related whatsoever to ball joint height, those are from different length upper arms, which change the camber at a static height or at any given suspension position.

The original question was if there were tire wear issues from excessive lowering, and some of the additional information I gave answered the question of why.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
i2fat
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
9
08-04-13 04:15 AM
jasone36
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
7
09-28-12 05:29 AM
uncandid
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
9
07-03-12 03:16 PM
Peter_Klim
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
2
04-17-10 10:25 AM
roller400
Suspension and Brakes
1
10-02-03 12:17 AM



Quick Reply: SC430 lowering /tire problems



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:58 PM.