Ferrari California have very similar styling, shape and proportion to SC430!
#16
I would agree that some people say the California is a chick car. To which I would say chick cars don't do sub 12 second quarter miles. But I've also heard many more people say the SC430 is a chick car too (at least in stock form). As much as I love the car, the SC is much more of a chick car than the California.
#18
I would agree that some people say the California is a chick car. To which I would say chick cars don't do sub 12 second quarter miles. But I've also heard many more people say the SC430 is a chick car too (at least in stock form). As much as I love the car, the SC is much more of a chick car than the California.
In a way, I am with husker741. Most of the time, I prefer a top of the line car within a certain brand. Where the SC430 is a top of the line Lexus, the California is a bottom of the line Ferrari.
But since the image of the Ferrari brand is WAYYYYYYYYYYY higher then Lexus, I would still prefer the crappy Ferrari over the best Lexus
Before someone jump me on saying the LFA is the top Lexus, the LFA is so off the chart and is not a regular model, I don't count it as a Lexus.
#19
Actually a fully loaded 2012 911 Turbo S convertible is not that much cheaper, they tops out at $180k~$190k.
California vs. 911 Turbo S convertible is like SC430 vs. Nissan GTR.
Same price, one is for looks, the other is for speed
The following users liked this post:
Autoplak (10-10-23)
#22
I fell in love with the S2000 and dreamed of owning one. But ended up owning a Miata, enjoyed it a lot, too. When I ride the SC, I am happy.
#23
We also looked at the Miata before we bought the S but it too was pretty small, but a little more polished.
I do believe we found the right car this time!!
The following users liked this post:
mandyfig (10-12-23)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post