Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Audi announces new two-digit naming system (update on page 3)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-17 | 03:25 PM
  #1  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,321
Likes: 129
From: California
Default Audi announces new two-digit naming system (update on page 3)



Once upon a time, model numbers indicated a car's engine displacement. A BMW 328i had a 2.8-liter engine, a Mercedes S500 had a 5.0-liter V8, etc. Then engine downsizing happened. Since a new carcouldn't have a lower and thus seemingly inferior number than its predecessor, we ended up with model numbers that represented nothing but an incremental trip up the heirarchy. Perhaps it makes no difference to consumers, but Audi has announced that it's going to bring order to chaos with a new name/badging system for the 2018 model year.

Here's how it works. Current model names (A4, Q5, etc.) will remain the same, but their engine designations (2.0T, 3.0T, etc) will switch to a two-digit number that represents the car's horsepower (or kilowatts as Audi used in the announcement) regardless of whether it runs on gasoline, diesel, electricity or a combination of fuels.

The numbering starts at 30, which Audi explains represents engines making 110 to 131 horsepower. The other example Audi gives is 45, which represents cars making 230 to 252 hp. At the top of the range is 70, which is for cars that make over 544 hp. As an example, our 252-horsepower Audi A4 Allroad long-term car would have a 45 appended to its hatch-mounted "allroad" badge along with TFSI to denote that it's powered by gasoline.

It's not a consistent system, though. The range of power covered by each number isn't consistent, and there are some gaps, as shown by Autocar's complete breakdown of the numbering scheme using British brake horsepower. For instance, the 40 range covers cars between 170 and 203 of our horsepower, a difference of about 30 hp compared with a difference of about 20 hp for the 45 range. This also means that there isn't a new number for cars making between 204 and 229 hp. Even though Audi may not currently have engines in the gap zones, it seems like expanding each group to fill the gaps would be a useful way to future-proof the system for new engines.

Despite this, we appreciate Audi's attempt to bring meaning to badging again. There's also another good reason for the system. It provides a unified way of ranking powertrains instead of displacement, which isn't necessarily accurate at conveying performance between gas and diesel engines, and is irrelevant for electric and electrified powertrains.

As Dr. Dietmar Voggenreiter, board of management member for sales and marketing at AUDI AG, puts it, "As alternative drive technologies become increasingly relevant, engine displacement as a performance attribute is becoming less important to our customers. The clarity and logic of structuring the designations according to power output makes it possible to distinguish between the various performance levels."

However, before you start memorizing future names and numbers, there's a chance they won't even be making it to the United States. While an Audi representative in Germany told us that the new naming strategy was global and that it would indeed be coming here, a representative in the United States indicated that it had not been confirmed. Such confusion is not unusual, however, and we expect a definitive answer in the near future as corporate wires become uncrossed.
Source
Old 08-23-17 | 03:34 PM
  #2  
grabber2's Avatar
grabber2
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 48
From: NY
Default

I believe they already did that in China few years ago......I keep seeing Audi A6/A8 with 45 TFSI. I thought those were V8....lol
Old 08-23-17 | 03:35 PM
  #3  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 80
From: CA
Default

yay more confusion.
Old 08-23-17 | 03:53 PM
  #4  
jwong77's Avatar
jwong77
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 15
From: CA
Default

Uhhh.... if you need to refer to a chart, its probably too confusing.
Old 08-23-17 | 04:46 PM
  #5  
yardie876's Avatar
yardie876
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 87
From: SoFlo
Default

......................what? This is the most confusing pile of poo I’ve ever seen lol.
Old 08-23-17 | 05:17 PM
  #6  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 58,031
Likes: 2,785
From: Maryland
Default

Don't these guys have more to worry about than coming up with more strange naming conventions?!?!
Old 08-23-17 | 05:28 PM
  #7  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,599
Likes: 88
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by SW15LS
Don't these guys have more to worry about than coming up with more strange naming conventions?!?!
Welcome to the world of auto-marketing. Always was, and always will be, the anthesis of common sense.
Old 08-23-17 | 06:47 PM
  #8  
GiantsFan's Avatar
GiantsFan
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,550
Likes: 10
From: CA - Norcal
Default

This actually makes sense... Kinda
Old 08-23-17 | 07:27 PM
  #9  
Sulu's Avatar
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 31
From: Canada
Default

It is still rather arbitrary, it seems; there is no consistent multiplication constant to tell you what power rating (hp or kW) corresponds to a model designation. And, if the current lowest model designation is "30" (for models with between 81 and 96kW (107 and 127bhp)), does that mean there will (or may) be a "20" or "25" model in the future with less than 100hp?

How about these model designations instead?
"75" for 75 kW to 100 kW (100hp to 134hp)
"100" for 100 kW to 125 kW
"125" for 125 kW to 150 kW
Old 08-23-17 | 08:13 PM
  #10  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,599
Likes: 88
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by GiantsFan
This actually makes sense... Kinda
Actually, they're playing numbers-games with the figures to try and disguise the fact that engines are being downsized.

We also saw that, back in the late 1970s and early-80s, when Detroit was downsizing their cars...except with names instead of number/letter combos. A company would take a name of a former full-size car like (Pontiac) "Bonneville" or (Plymouth) "Fury" and transfer the name to its existing mid-size car. Thus, the former full-size Bonneville and Fury because a new mid-size vehicle with the same name. The old full-size Bonneville was re-named the Pontiac Parisienne, and the old full-size Plymouth Fury the Grand Fury (and Dodge Grand Monaco). Another example was with the Ford LTD/LTD II.
Old 08-23-17 | 08:53 PM
  #11  
geko29's Avatar
geko29
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,128
Likes: 328
From: IL
Default

Dumb, dumb, dumb. Audi currently has the most transparent badging of all the German makes. With nearly all of their engines now sporting forced induction, displacement has once again become a valid frame of reference, vs the old days when the 3.0T made WAY more power than the 3.2/3.6 it replaced. I also don't believe they've ever offered more than one diesel within a model in the US, and there's zero chance of that ever happening post-dieselgate. So there's no issue just calling those TDI.

S555TFSI just rolls right off the tongue, doesn't it?
Old 08-23-17 | 09:33 PM
  #12  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,755
Likes: 171
From: California
Default

This is totally unneeded. It also goes to show how competitive this industry is. It is so competitive, even BAD IDEAS are getting copied. Yeah, it used to be just good ideas were copied. Now everyone does everything someone else has done even if it's a bad idea. Audi is the only brand left where everyone knows an A4, A5, A6, etc. Adding confusion is just going to hurt sales when potential customers can't figure it out at first blush. Hopefully this doesn't make it to the U.S.
Old 08-23-17 | 09:36 PM
  #13  
Aron9000's Avatar
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 28
From: TN
Default

Best thing I can say is at least they aren't throwing the baby out with the bath water, we still have A4, A6, A8, S4, S6, S8, RS4, RS6 RS8, Q3, Q5, Q7, its easy to identify which model you are talking about at least.

Could be much worse like at Infiniti, everything is now Q or QX with the number indicating the size of the vehicle, stupid, stupid, stupid idea IMO. Especially when you already have a lot of name recognition with things like G35, G37(sporty sedan/coupe), QX56(huge SUV), FX(sporty SUV). Or Cadillac, finally when people get used to CTS, ATS, SRX, you have to change **** up for no reason. Personally I miss the days of Deville, Seville and Eldorado, nothing wrong with making luxo-barges if they drove nice, looked contemporary, were well made, and reliable over the long haul(hello Lexus)
Old 08-24-17 | 12:28 AM
  #14  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,321
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Best thing I can say is at least they aren't throwing the baby out with the bath water, we still have A4, A6, A8, S4, S6, S8, RS4, RS6 RS8, Q3, Q5, Q7, its easy to identify which model you are talking about at least.

Could be much worse like at Infiniti, everything is now Q or QX with the number indicating the size of the vehicle, stupid, stupid, stupid idea IMO. Especially when you already have a lot of name recognition with things like G35, G37(sporty sedan/coupe), QX56(huge SUV), FX(sporty SUV). Or Cadillac, finally when people get used to CTS, ATS, SRX, you have to change **** up for no reason. Personally I miss the days of Deville, Seville and Eldorado, nothing wrong with making luxo-barges if they drove nice, looked contemporary, were well made, and reliable over the long haul(hello Lexus)
funny, all three automakers you mention have had Johan de Nysschen at the helm in some form or another. Man really knows how to leave a mark
Old 08-24-17 | 04:58 AM
  #15  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,463
Likes: 2,546
From: Present
Default

It's not perfect but rating on power and not displacement makes sense. With electrics, diesels, gas, hybrids, turbos, etc., reg engine size and cylinders are now meaningless.


Quick Reply: Audi announces new two-digit naming system (update on page 3)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25 PM.