IS 500 Threads Conversations specifically about the 2022+ IS500 models.

Are the Stock Rear Rotors Really This Thin?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-24, 04:25 PM
  #1  
Orkboyz
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Orkboyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 85 Likes on 32 Posts
Default Are the Stock Rear Rotors Really This Thin?

I had one of the rear wheels on my IS500 off today, and the rear rotor thickness caught me by surprise. It looked way too thin for a 2-ton car. The car only has 8K miles and stock pads, so I discounted rotor/pad wear. A quick check with some vernier calipers had both rear rotors at 20mm. Fronts are 30mm. Pads are good, about 10mm all around.


I know the IS 500 in its stock form is not intended for the repeated heavy braking you do on track, and that the front brakes do most of the work, but this seems unusually thin to me even for occasional spirited driving along back roads or canyons.
Old 09-22-24, 05:44 PM
  #2  
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 20,615
Received 3,053 Likes on 2,565 Posts
Default

Many cars don't even have vented rear rotors be happy you have that lol. Very disappointing to see that level or rust already.
Old 09-22-24, 07:47 PM
  #3  
SlowlaneAZ
Advanced
 
SlowlaneAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: AZ
Posts: 623
Received 484 Likes on 242 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
Many cars don't even have vented rear rotors be happy you have that lol. Very disappointing to see that level or rust already.
My 2016 tacoma had rear drum breaks.....
Old 09-22-24, 08:32 PM
  #4  
604GSE21
Instructor
 
604GSE21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 990
Received 394 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

the newest Audi Q4 E-tron have rear drum brakes too lol
Old 09-22-24, 10:26 PM
  #5  
Orkboyz
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Orkboyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 85 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

I've looked for rotor specs regarding thickness but cannot find anything definitive for the IS500. For an IS350 F Sport the discard width on the rears is supposedly 17mm. That seems reasonable given that I am measuring 20mm, but it still bugs me. I am probably hung up on it because I am accustomed to the beefier rotors on the Z06. The discard width on those is 30mm front and 25mm rear.

Also, I have to keep reminding myself that I got this car as a daily driver, not to be a backup weekend track car that I drive daily.

Old 09-22-24, 10:30 PM
  #6  
mavisky
Pit Crew
 
mavisky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 205
Received 169 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Nose heavy car so not a ton of need for massive rear rotors.
Old 09-23-24, 05:21 AM
  #7  
Avi8orco
Driver
 
Avi8orco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SlowlaneAZ
My 2016 tacoma had rear drum breaks.....
I had one too…and those fkn things worked. That thing could hold a bulldozer from rolling down a hill strapped to the tow hitch.
Old 09-23-24, 05:43 AM
  #8  
SlowlaneAZ
Advanced
 
SlowlaneAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: AZ
Posts: 623
Received 484 Likes on 242 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Avi8orco
I had one too…and those fkn things worked. That thing could hold a bulldozer from rolling down a hill strapped to the tow hitch.
In all fairness, it really did. I never had any issues with it. It was just odd to see drum brakes on a 40k+ vehicle.
Old 09-23-24, 06:11 AM
  #9  
snowyblue
Pit Crew
 
snowyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: mo
Posts: 100
Received 66 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

for the 12.7 inch diameter rear rotors, the standard thickness is 20mm. min thickness is 18.5mm
Old 09-23-24, 06:51 AM
  #10  
Orkboyz
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Orkboyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 85 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mavisky
Nose heavy car so not a ton of need for massive rear rotors.
Originally Posted by snowyblue
for the 12.7 inch diameter rear rotors, the standard thickness is 20mm. min thickness is 18.5mm
Yeah, I've become so accustomed to thicker rotors that seeing the.rears were only 20mm caught me of guard. So far I have resisted the urge to flush the brake fluid with some high temp fluid and throw on some more aggressive pads just to see what it is like at a place like VIR. I know if I do, that other changes will eventually follow, and I'll end up going down a rabbit hole of suspension and brake mods along with an extra set of wheels/tires.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
philz
IS F (2008-2014)
1
09-22-21 08:50 PM
anesthesia
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
18
03-27-13 05:41 AM
jimmysc3
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
16
02-17-11 03:06 PM
tangcoral
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
15
06-05-08 12:56 AM
rclab1
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
7
09-01-06 11:47 AM



Quick Reply: Are the Stock Rear Rotors Really This Thin?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:06 PM.