whitels

I have searched pages and pages of CL info but got nothing definitive about which of the two will provide a lower drop? There's a lot of numbers thrown around but nothing that sounded certain for sure.

Would someone who knows it pls. respond? I need to make a decision quickly. Thanks MUCH!!!

I already know that Eibach made the L-tuned but I'm still of the impression that the two are physically different.

GS4Will

white...

to a great extent, i firmly believe that Eibach will not make a springs JUST for L-tuned...too much cost is involved...just my $0.01.

whitels

Absolutely agree with your logic. But when I searched, I found that some members would say that the Eibach is stiffer than the L-tuned, or the L-tuned would drop the car more than the Eibach, still others would say the complete opposite. These discussions confuse me since these guys must be seeing a difference between the two springs. I'm hoping that anyone with direct knowledge to say that "Yes, they are one and the same", or "No, the L-tuned is a softer spring than the Eibach". Maybe I should take a poll but someone here must definitely be on the know. GS4will, thanks for your input.

GS4Will

white...

funny you brought up this topic as i was just comparing some specs the other day on several different spring after i have seen HR, Eibach and my jdm springs.

Eibach gives the least drop, F(~25-30mm), R(~10-15mm)
HR spec says "1.4/1.2" drop..but the actual the down is not as much as my jdm springs of 35mm/30mm...visually, a significance.
on the spec sheet, both should drop about the same.

also the Eibach have higher spring rate, though with lesser drop, it actually is slightly firmer springs.

whitels

Hey GS4will...

Good stuff- thanks! How do you like your JDM springs?

GS4Will

sure...they are might comfy..and the lowered LOOK...

i was a bit concerned before i put on 18x9+10 +37 offsets f+r..but no rubbing at all:eek: