GS400 17" tire choices
#17
It does have some impact but the makeup of the tire and tread material / design has a lot more to do with peformance. A 50 series touring tire is not going to handle anywhere near a 50 series ultra performance tire. You can have an extra short and stiff sidewall but so what, if the tire just slides out from under the car when going around the corners.
Thats all I was getting at.
Thats all I was getting at.
#18
Originally Posted by morris
It does have some impact but the makeup of the tire and tread material / design has a lot more to do with peformance. A 50 series touring tire is not going to handle anywhere near a 50 series ultra performance tire. You can have an extra short and stiff sidewall but so what, if the tire just slides out from under the car when going around the corners.
Thats all I was getting at.
Thats all I was getting at.
#19
Choices
Thanks all for your opinions. Keep them coming as I going to hold off buying anything for a while. Took the can to NTB and they measured my tread. Tires were anywhere from 5 to 7/32s and they said I have plenty of mileage left. If they continue to tramline like they have been recently, even though I am keeping them pumped up, they might get the boot earlier.
It seems a fair amount of you like the Falkens. The quote below is from Shogun who feels the Falkens ride hard. It seems the Pirelli P-Zero Ner is a good candidate.
Bottom line, are both the Falken and Pirelli as good or better that the OEM Bridgestone RE030 in every respect?
Thanks..
Neil
It seems a fair amount of you like the Falkens. The quote below is from Shogun who feels the Falkens ride hard. It seems the Pirelli P-Zero Ner is a good candidate.
Originally Posted by Shogun
For the value tire (and I've had the Falken's 512s - felt too hard and the Sumitomo's HTRs - worn out at 20K) try the Kumho ASX's at $98 per in 245/45/17.
I bought these a month or so ago and have been extremely pleased. The Tire Rack has a review of these tires against the P-Zero Nero (sorta a cheap vs. expensive comparison) and they came in with 98% of the Nero's capabilities at a much less expensive price.
No balancing or round problems and they ride smooth and quiet. Tread pattern looks more aggressive in-person than in the picture. My biggest gripe is from a sidewall appearance standpoint. Instead of a smooth sidewall it has those tiny vertical ribs and then there's a small (but really hokey) "all season" moniker written in cursive - which really doesn't fit the rest of the tire's looks or capabilities.
Great tire, great grip - good luck.
Eric
I bought these a month or so ago and have been extremely pleased. The Tire Rack has a review of these tires against the P-Zero Nero (sorta a cheap vs. expensive comparison) and they came in with 98% of the Nero's capabilities at a much less expensive price.
No balancing or round problems and they ride smooth and quiet. Tread pattern looks more aggressive in-person than in the picture. My biggest gripe is from a sidewall appearance standpoint. Instead of a smooth sidewall it has those tiny vertical ribs and then there's a small (but really hokey) "all season" moniker written in cursive - which really doesn't fit the rest of the tire's looks or capabilities.
Great tire, great grip - good luck.
Eric
Bottom line, are both the Falken and Pirelli as good or better that the OEM Bridgestone RE030 in every respect?
Thanks..
Neil
#21
Originally Posted by Neil64
Do both the Falken and the Pirelli have any rim protection? How about the Toyo Proxy 4s?
#23
Choices
Falken does not list a rim protection ridge as one of the features of this tire but do for some of their other tires, hence, it probably doesn't have it.
Ntran18, why are you using 235/50/17s? I assume it was to give up a little handling to pick up ride?? Was it worth it - huge difference? Were you using Bridgestone RE030s prior to your switch to the Falkens? If so, how would you compare the Falkens vs. the RE030s in every catagory - ride, dry handling, wet handling, noise, braking, hydroplaning, etc?
Ultimately, removing price and longevity from the equation, I don't see how the Falkens can compete with the RE030s. From my understanding, the RE030 is a ultra high performance tire vs. the Falken, which is an all season perfomance tire. Occasionally, a product comes out that surpasses everyone's expectations, is the Falken one those products that compete with tires at the next level?
I know I am being somewhat ****, but I have been living with the RE030s tramlining because, in my opinion, they seem to do everything well, not to mention were already paid for when I bought the car. I do not want to put an inferior tire on the car. In fact, the only sore spot I have with the car, is tramlining which I hope is caused completely by the tires and not anything else. I'd be willing to pay for a good performing tire but was thinking Z rated tires are way overkill for me. I usually don't exceed 80 and take turns some what fast, but not fast enough to have abnormal wear of get the tires to squeal.
That leads my to another sore spot. If the RE030s are notorious for tramlining, how could Lexus continue to use them as their 17" optional tires from 98-05? The 06s that I have seen use Dunlops. Did Lexus use any other 17" tire from 98-06? Are the Dunlops good?
Decisons, decisions, decisons....
God help me if I ever want to change wheel and tire size!
Thanks..
Neil
Ntran18, why are you using 235/50/17s? I assume it was to give up a little handling to pick up ride?? Was it worth it - huge difference? Were you using Bridgestone RE030s prior to your switch to the Falkens? If so, how would you compare the Falkens vs. the RE030s in every catagory - ride, dry handling, wet handling, noise, braking, hydroplaning, etc?
Ultimately, removing price and longevity from the equation, I don't see how the Falkens can compete with the RE030s. From my understanding, the RE030 is a ultra high performance tire vs. the Falken, which is an all season perfomance tire. Occasionally, a product comes out that surpasses everyone's expectations, is the Falken one those products that compete with tires at the next level?
I know I am being somewhat ****, but I have been living with the RE030s tramlining because, in my opinion, they seem to do everything well, not to mention were already paid for when I bought the car. I do not want to put an inferior tire on the car. In fact, the only sore spot I have with the car, is tramlining which I hope is caused completely by the tires and not anything else. I'd be willing to pay for a good performing tire but was thinking Z rated tires are way overkill for me. I usually don't exceed 80 and take turns some what fast, but not fast enough to have abnormal wear of get the tires to squeal.
That leads my to another sore spot. If the RE030s are notorious for tramlining, how could Lexus continue to use them as their 17" optional tires from 98-05? The 06s that I have seen use Dunlops. Did Lexus use any other 17" tire from 98-06? Are the Dunlops good?
Decisons, decisions, decisons....
God help me if I ever want to change wheel and tire size!
Thanks..
Neil
#24
I went with this size because it was the closest match in diameter to my original 215/60/16. I originally had Bridgestone which wasn't bad. With these is handling is a little more responsive. I got these more as touring than performance.
The ridge got me by surprise after the installer put it on.
The ridge got me by surprise after the installer put it on.
#25
Originally Posted by Neil64
Do both the Falken and the Pirelli have any rim protection? How about the Toyo Proxy 4s?
Thanks..
Neil
Thanks..
Neil
http://www.tiretrends.com/catalog2.p...rrencyCode--1C
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post